These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34843331)

  • 21. Disfluencies signal reference to novel objects for adults but not children.
    Owens SJ; Thacker JM; Graham SA
    J Child Lang; 2018 May; 45(3):581-609. PubMed ID: 29141698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection and Recognition of Asynchronous Auditory/Visual Speech: Effects of Age, Hearing Loss, and Talker Accent.
    Gordon-Salant S; Schwartz MS; Oppler KA; Yeni-Komshian GH
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():772867. PubMed ID: 35153900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Potential Role of Talker Age in the Perception of Regional Accent.
    Shin W; Lee H; Shin J; Holliday JJ
    Lang Speech; 2020 Sep; 63(3):479-505. PubMed ID: 31288603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Listener estimates of talker age in a single-talker, 50-year longitudinal sample.
    Hunter EJ; Ferguson SH
    J Commun Disord; 2017 Jul; 68():103-112. PubMed ID: 28708986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How Spoken Language Comprehension is Achieved by Older Listeners in Difficult Listening Situations.
    Schneider BA; Avivi-Reich M; Daneman M
    Exp Aging Res; 2016; 42(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 26683040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of gap duration on the perception of fluent versus disfluent speech.
    Warner HJ; Whalen DH; Harel D; Jackson ES
    J Fluency Disord; 2022 Mar; 71():105896. PubMed ID: 35032922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tracking talker-specific cues to lexical stress: Evidence from perceptual learning.
    Severijnen GGA; Di Dona G; Bosker HR; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Apr; 49(4):549-565. PubMed ID: 37184938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.
    Cummings SN; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2335-2359. PubMed ID: 36076119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.
    Schvartz KC; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 22237163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Listeners' attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception.
    Ingvalson EM; Lansford KL; Federova V; Fernandez G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL234. PubMed ID: 28372098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification.
    Lee JJ; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):2002-2015. PubMed ID: 35534783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Age effects on prosodic boundary perception.
    Ji J; Zhao X; Li Y; Yang X
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):262-274. PubMed ID: 38829339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages.
    Winters SJ; Levi SV; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4524-38. PubMed ID: 18537401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J; Wang X; Wang NY; Fu X; Gan T; Galvin JJ; Willis S; Xu K; Thomas M; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.