These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34843335)

  • 61. Reinforcer devaluation by extinction depends on the food restriction protocol.
    Baker TW; Weisman RG; Beninger RJ
    Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 22469648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Nicotine enhances responding with conditioned reinforcement.
    Olausson P; Jentsch JD; Taylor JR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jan; 171(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 13680077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Extinction of goal tracking also eliminates the conditioned reinforcing effects of an appetitive conditioned stimulus.
    Kearns DN; Tunstall BJ; Marks KR; Weiss SJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 22090259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Nicotine enhances responding for conditioned reinforcement via α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the ventral tegmental area, but not the nucleus accumbens or the prefrontal cortex.
    Tabbara RI; Fletcher PJ
    Neuropharmacology; 2019 Apr; 148():68-76. PubMed ID: 30550794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The probability of reinforcement per trial affects posttrial responding and subsequent extinction but not within-trial responding.
    Harris JA; Kwok DWS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 29323516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The effects of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement as a function of the amount of conditioning.
    Hoffman DC; Beninger RJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 87(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 3001808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Excitatory backward conditioning in an appetitive conditioned reinforcement preparation with rats.
    Urushihara K
    Behav Processes; 2004 Nov; 67(3):477-89. PubMed ID: 15518997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The partial reinforcement extinction effect: The proportion of trials reinforced during conditioning predicts the number of trials to extinction.
    Chan CKJ; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 30604994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Response duration is sensitive to both immediate and delayed reinforcement.
    Byrne T; Sarno B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):94-115. PubMed ID: 30565230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A comparison of the effects of discriminative and Pavlovian inhibitors and excitors on instrumental responding.
    Lombas AS; Kearns DN; Weiss SJ
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 18304758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Signaling added response-independent reinforcement to assess Pavlovian processes in resistance to change and relapse.
    Podlesnik CA; Fleet JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):179-97. PubMed ID: 25044232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The nature of phenotypic variation in Pavlovian conditioning.
    Iliescu AF; Hall J; Wilkinson LS; Dwyer DM; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(4):358-369. PubMed ID: 30407062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Responding for a conditioned reinforcer, and its enhancement by nicotine, is blocked by dopamine receptor antagonists and a 5-HT(2C) receptor agonist but not by a 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist.
    Guy EG; Fletcher PJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2014 Oct; 125():40-47. PubMed ID: 25158104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Conditioned reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with self-administered cocaine, heroin or sucrose: implications for the persistence of addictive behaviour.
    Di Ciano P; Everitt BJ
    Neuropharmacology; 2004; 47 Suppl 1():202-13. PubMed ID: 15464138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Partial reinforcement and conditioned taste aversion: No evidence for resistance to extinction.
    Dwyer DM; Gasalla P; López M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):274-284. PubMed ID: 28649917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Role of conditioned reinforcers in the initiation, maintenance and extinction of drug-seeking behavior.
    Davis WM; Smith SG
    Pavlov J Biol Sci; 1976; 11(4):222-36. PubMed ID: 1033507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The effects of (+)-amphetamine and apomorphine on responding for a conditioned reinforcer.
    Mazurski EJ; Beninger RJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 90(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 3097705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus.
    Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Jul; 9(3):225-47. PubMed ID: 6153052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Stimulus competition between a discrete cue and a training context: Cue competition does not result from the division of a limited resource.
    Urushihara K; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 19364229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.