These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34843362)

  • 1. Do judges prefer advisors with dependent or independent errors? Investigating judges' advice selection and advice weighting.
    Schulz-Hardt S; Wanzel SK; Rollwage J; Treffenstädt C; Schultze T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1636-1654. PubMed ID: 34843362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.
    Pescetelli N; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):507-526. PubMed ID: 33001684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategically overconfident (to a fault): How self-promotion motivates advisor confidence.
    Van Zant AB
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Jan; 107(1):109-129. PubMed ID: 33617278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disentangling the effects of advisor consensus and advice proximity.
    Wanzel SK; Schultze T; Schulz-Hardt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1669-1675. PubMed ID: 28287767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preferences for advisor agreement and accuracy.
    Jaquiery M; Yeung N
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0311211. PubMed ID: 39331636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural activity tracking identity and confidence in social information.
    Trudel N; Lockwood PL; Rushworth MFS; Wittmann MK
    Elife; 2023 Feb; 12():. PubMed ID: 36763582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining forecasts from advisors: The impact of advice independence and verbal versus numeric format.
    Strueder JD; Windschitl PD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Aug; 153(8):2088-2099. PubMed ID: 39101908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The implicit honesty premium: Why honest advice is more persuasive than highly informed advice.
    Haran U; Shalvi S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Apr; 149(4):757-773. PubMed ID: 31464509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trust, Confidence, and Expertise in a Judge-Advisor System.
    Sniezek JA; Van Swol LM
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 Mar; 84(2):288-307. PubMed ID: 11277673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judging the judges' performance in rhythmic gymnastics.
    Flessas K; Mylonas D; Panagiotaropoulou G; Tsopani D; Korda A; Siettos C; Di Cagno A; Evdokimidis I; Smyrnis N
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Mar; 47(3):640-8. PubMed ID: 24977695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are people more or less likely to follow advice that is accompanied by a confidence interval?
    Gaertig C; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jul; 152(7):2008-2025. PubMed ID: 37104799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When advisors do not know what is best for advisees: Uncertainty inhibits advice giving.
    Zhu R; Tang H; Xue J; Li Y; Liang Z; Wu S; Su S; Liu C
    Psych J; 2024 Aug; 13(4):663-678. PubMed ID: 38530882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unrealistic optimism in advice taking: A computational account.
    Leong YC; Zaki J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Feb; 147(2):170-189. PubMed ID: 29154614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The calculus of committee composition.
    Libby E; Glass L
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12642. PubMed ID: 20877471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the Inability to Ignore Useless Advice.
    Schultze T; Mojzisch A; Schulz-Hardt S
    Exp Psychol; 2017 May; 64(3):170-183. PubMed ID: 28633625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective judgments of deception in pain expression: accuracy and errors.
    Hadjistavropoulos HD; Craig KD; Hadjistavropoulos T; Poole GD
    Pain; 1996; 65(2-3):251-8. PubMed ID: 8826514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making.
    Kray LJ
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Sep; 83(1):82-106. PubMed ID: 10973784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications.
    Watamura E; Ioku T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277939. PubMed ID: 36409707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do People Inherently Dislike Uncertain Advice?
    Gaertig C; Simmons JP
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Apr; 29(4):504-520. PubMed ID: 29466077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young children heed advice selectively.
    Rakoczy H; Ehrling C; Harris PL; Schultze T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Oct; 138():71-87. PubMed ID: 26037403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.