These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34843362)

  • 21. Forming impressions from self-truncated samples of traits-interplay of Thurstonian and Brunswikian sampling effects.
    Prager J; Fiedler K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Sep; 121(3):474-497. PubMed ID: 34807699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating experts may serve psychological needs: Self-esteem, bias blind spot, and processing fluency explain confirmation effect in assessing financial advisors' authority.
    Zaleskiewicz T; Gasiorowska A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Mar; 27(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 32597675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Subjective recalibration of advisors' probability estimates.
    Shlomi Y; Wallsten TS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 20702867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variations in reliability and validity do not influence judge, attorney, and mock juror decisions about psychological expert evidence.
    Chorn JA; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Dec; 43(6):542-557. PubMed ID: 31524421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the accuracy, media representation, and public perception of psychological scientists' judgments of societal change.
    Hutcherson CA; Sharpinskyi K; Varnum MEW; Rotella A; Wormley AS; Tay L; Grossmann I
    Am Psychol; 2023 Nov; 78(8):968-981. PubMed ID: 37079818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How heuristic credibility cues affect credibility judgments and decisions.
    Gugerty L; Link DM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Dec; 26(4):620-645. PubMed ID: 32658526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interpersonal orientation and the accuracy of personality judgments.
    Vogt DS; Colvin CR
    J Pers; 2003 Apr; 71(2):267-95. PubMed ID: 12693518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spurious consensus and opinion revision: why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments?
    Yaniv I; Choshen-Hillel S; Milyavsky M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):558-63. PubMed ID: 19271867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Why Does Advice Discounting Occur? The Combined Roles of Confidence and Trust.
    Wang X; Du X
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2381. PubMed ID: 30555394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tips From the Top: Do the Best Performers Really Give the Best Advice?
    Levari DE; Gilbert DT; Wilson TD
    Psychol Sci; 2022 May; 33(5):685-698. PubMed ID: 35436156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gaze Behavior of Gymnastics Judges: Where Do Experienced Judges and Gymnasts Look While Judging?
    Pizzera A; Möller C; Plessner H
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2018 Mar; 89(1):112-119. PubMed ID: 29351508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges.
    Ariely D; Au WT; Bender RH; Budescu DV; Dietz CB; Gu H; Wallsten TS; Zauberman G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):130-47. PubMed ID: 10937317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of children's stuttered and nonstuttered speech by highly experienced judges: binary judgments and comparisons with disfluency-types definitions.
    Bothe AK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 18658057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of angle of view on judges' evaluations of inverted cross in men's rings.
    Dallas G; Mavidis A; Chairopoulou C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Feb; 112(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 21466084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using Advice and Assessing Its Quality.
    Harvey N; Harries C; Fischer I
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Mar; 81(2):252-273. PubMed ID: 10706816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.
    Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation.
    Yaniv I; Kleinberger E
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Nov; 83(2):260-281. PubMed ID: 11056071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Flexible use of confidence to guide advice requests.
    Carlebach N; Yeung N
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105264. PubMed ID: 36087357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptions of custody: Similarities and disparities among police, judges, social psychologists, and laypeople.
    Alceste F; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):197-214. PubMed ID: 34351203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of time-interval judgement training on real-time measurement of stuttering.
    Cordes AK; Ingham RJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):862-79. PubMed ID: 10450907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.