205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34843533)
21. Community-led risk analysis of direct-to-consumer whole-genome sequencing.
Samlali K; Thornbury M; Venter A
Biochem Cell Biol; 2022 Dec; 100(6):499-509. PubMed ID: 35939839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Knowledge and Attitudes about Privacy and Secondary Data Use among African-Americans Using Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.
Ziegler E; Mladucky J; Baty B; Anderson R; Botkin J
Public Health Genomics; 2022 Sep; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 36167059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.
Schaper M; Wöhlke S; Schicktanz S
Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Mar; 22(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 29705970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Consumer Views on Health Applications of Consumer Digital Data and Health Privacy Among US Adults: Qualitative Interview Study.
Grande D; Luna Marti X; Merchant RM; Asch DA; Dolan A; Sharma M; Cannuscio CC
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jun; 23(6):e29395. PubMed ID: 34106074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adult adoptees and their use of direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Searching for family, searching for health.
Lee H; Vogel RI; LeRoy B; Zierhut HA
J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):144-157. PubMed ID: 32602181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of investigative genetic genealogy: perceptions of UK professional and public stakeholders.
Samuel G; Kennett D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102366. PubMed ID: 32781429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
Parsons JA; Baker PE
J Med Ethics; 2022 Mar; 48(3):205-212. PubMed ID: 33298600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories.
Su Y; Howard HC; Borry P
J Community Genet; 2011 Sep; 2(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 22109820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is It Ethical to Use Genealogy Data to Solve Crimes?
Berkman BE; Miller WK; Grady C
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Sep; 169(5):333-334. PubMed ID: 29809242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
Roberts JS; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Green RC
Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 28068660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Committee Opinion No. 724: Consumer Testing for Disease Risk.
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):e270-e273. PubMed ID: 29064973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Committee Opinion No. 724 Summary: Consumer Testing for Disease Risk.
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1176-1177. PubMed ID: 29064967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Adoptees' Pursuit of Genomic Testing to Fill Gaps in Family Health History and Reduce Healthcare Disparity.
Casas KA
Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2018; 8(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 30220696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis.
Basch CH; Hillyer GC; Samuel L; Datuowei E; Cohn B
J Community Genet; 2023 Feb; 14(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 36239910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. At-home genetic testing in pediatrics.
Weissman SM; Kirkpatrick B; Ramos E
Curr Opin Pediatr; 2019 Dec; 31(6):723-731. PubMed ID: 31693579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using genetic genealogy databases in missing persons cases and to develop suspect leads in violent crimes.
Kennett D
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():107-117. PubMed ID: 31153988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exploring Genetic Data Across Individuals: Design and Evaluation of a Novel Comparative Report Tool.
Westendorf L; Shaer O; Pollalis C; Verish C; Nov O; Ball MP
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Sep; 20(9):e10297. PubMed ID: 30249582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Media coverage of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Lynch J; Parrott A; Hopkin RJ; Myers M
J Genet Couns; 2011 Oct; 20(5):486-94. PubMed ID: 21638197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?
Wallace SE; Gourna EG; Nikolova V; Sheehan NA
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Dec; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 26645273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.
Metcalfe SA; Hickerton C; Savard J; Stackpoole E; Tytherleigh R; Tutty E; Terrill B; Turbitt E; Gray K; Middleton A; Wilson B; Newson AJ; Gaff C
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):290-299. PubMed ID: 30439534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
