These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34844237)

  • 21. A hybrid approach to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Quigley RL
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011; 17(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 21697789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of endovascular versus epicardial lead placement for resynchronization therapy.
    Garikipati NV; Mittal S; Chaudhry F; Musat DL; Sichrovsky T; Preminger M; Arshad A; Steinberg JS
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 113(5):840-4. PubMed ID: 24406108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Poulsen SH; Böttcher M; Nørgaard BL; Bouchelouche K; Mortensen PT; Gerdes C; Nielsen JC
    Trials; 2013 Apr; 14():113. PubMed ID: 23782792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implantation of left ventricular epicardial leads in cardiosurgical patients with impaired cardiac function--a worthwhile procedure in concomitant surgical interventions?
    Mellert F; Schneider C; Esmailzadeh B; Balta O; Haushofer M; Schiller W; Preusse CJ; Welz A
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 60(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 21425053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Endurance and performance of two different concepts for left ventricular stimulation with bipolar epicardial leads in long-term follow-up.
    Burger H; Kempfert J; van Linden A; Szalay Z; Schoenburg M; Walther T; Ziegelhoeffer T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 60(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 21789760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Epicardial versus transvenous left ventricular lead placement in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from a randomized prospective study.
    Doll N; Piorkowski C; Czesla M; Kallenbach M; Rastan AJ; Arya A; Mohr FW
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 56(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 18615370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of QRS duration on outcome of death or appropriate defibrillator therapy by strategy of left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients.
    Saba S; Marek J; Alam MB; Adelstein E; Schwartzman D; Jain S; Gorcsan J
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 41(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 25391355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multimodality imaging for real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations.
    Salden OAE; van den Broek HT; van Everdingen WM; Mohamed Hoesein FAA; Velthuis BK; Doevendans PA; Cramer MJ; Tuinenburg AE; Leufkens P; van Slochteren FJ; Meine M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 30847659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surface electrogram-guided left ventricular lead placement improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Şipal A; Bozyel S; Aktaş M; Derviş E; Akbulut T; Argan O; Çelikyurt U; Ural D; Şahin T; Ağır A; Vural A
    Anatol J Cardiol; 2018 Mar; 19(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29521312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Event-free survival following CRT with surgically implanted LV leads versus standard transvenous approach.
    Miller AL; Kramer DB; Lewis EF; Koplan B; Epstein LM; Tedrow U
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Apr; 34(4):490-500. PubMed ID: 21463344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using three-dimensional echocardiography to guide left ventricle lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: does it make any difference.
    Badran HA; Kamel JZ; Mohamed TR; Abdelhamid MA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Apr; 48(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 28194611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Regional Left Ventricular Electrical Activation and Peak Contraction Are Closely Related in Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Mafi-Rad M; Van't Sant J; Blaauw Y; Doevendans PA; Cramer MJ; Crijns HJ; Prinzen FW; Meine M; Vernooy K
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 3(8):854-862. PubMed ID: 29759782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Usefulness of echocardiographically guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermediate QRS width and non-left bundle branch block morphology.
    Marek JJ; Saba S; Onishi T; Ryo K; Schwartzman D; Adelstein EC; Gorcsan J
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 24169014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Longer inter-lead electrical delay is associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with presumed optimal left ventricular lead position.
    Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Nørgaard BL; Stephansen C; Poulsen SH; Kristensen J; Gerdes C; Nielsen JC
    Europace; 2018 Oct; 20(10):1630-1637. PubMed ID: 29377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive factors of difficult implantation procedure in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bisch L; Da Costa A; Dauphinot V; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Khris L; M'baye A; Isaaz K
    Europace; 2010 Aug; 12(8):1141-8. PubMed ID: 20573673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
    Rönn F; Kesek M; Karp K; Henein M; Jensen SM
    Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1747-52. PubMed ID: 21712261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes with left ventricular lead concordant with latest mechanical activation: A meta-analysis.
    Allen LaPointe NM; Ali-Ahmed F; Dalgaard F; Kosinski AS; Sanders Schmidler G; Al-Khatib SM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Aug; 45(8):930-939. PubMed ID: 35687711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reverse ventricular remodeling and long-term survival in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization with surgically versus percutaneously placed left ventricular pacing leads.
    Rickard J; Johnston DR; Price J; Tedford R; Baranowski B; Bassiouny M; Cantillon D; Grimm RA; Tang WHW; Varma N; Wilkoff BL
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Mar; 12(3):517-523. PubMed ID: 25460866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Alternative to left ventricular lead implantation through the coronary sinus: 1-year experience with a minimally invasive and robotically guided approach.
    Amraoui S; Labrousse L; Sohal M; Jansens JL; Berte B; Derval N; Denis A; Ploux S; Haissaguerre M; Jais P; Bordachar P; Ritter P
    Europace; 2017 Jan; 19(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 26811434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in postmyocardial infarction patients.
    Muto C; Solimene F; Russo V; Nigro G; Rago A; Chianese R; Chiariello P; Ciardiello C; Caliendo L
    Future Cardiol; 2018 May; 14(3):215-224. PubMed ID: 29767542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.