212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34844332)
1. Laundering of face masks represents an additional source of synthetic and natural microfibers to aquatic ecosystems.
De Felice B; Antenucci S; Ortenzi MA; Parolini M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 1):150495. PubMed ID: 34844332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microfiber release from different fabrics during washing.
Yang L; Qiao F; Lei K; Li H; Kang Y; Cui S; An L
Environ Pollut; 2019 Jun; 249():136-143. PubMed ID: 30884392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microfibers generated from the laundering of cotton, rayon and polyester based fabrics and their aquatic biodegradation.
Zambrano MC; Pawlak JJ; Daystar J; Ankeny M; Cheng JJ; Venditti RA
Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 May; 142():394-407. PubMed ID: 31232317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microfiber releasing into urban rivers from face masks during COVID-19.
Wang F; Wu H; Li J; Liu J; Xu Q; An L
J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 319():115741. PubMed ID: 35841777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncovering the release of micro/nanoplastics from disposable face masks at times of COVID-19.
Morgana S; Casentini B; Amalfitano S
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Oct; 419():126507. PubMed ID: 34323718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Used disposable face masks are significant sources of microplastics to environment.
Chen X; Chen X; Liu Q; Zhao Q; Xiong X; Wu C
Environ Pollut; 2021 Sep; 285():117485. PubMed ID: 34087638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental risks of polymer materials from disposable face masks linked to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Du H; Huang S; Wang J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 815():152980. PubMed ID: 35007580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Release of tens of thousands of microfibers from discarded face masks under simulated environmental conditions.
Wu P; Li J; Lu X; Tang Y; Cai Z
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150458. PubMed ID: 34592275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acrylic fabrics as a source of microplastics from portable washer and dryer: Impact of washing and drying parameters.
Mahbub MS; Shams M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 834():155429. PubMed ID: 35461942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of dyes and finishes on the microfibers released on the laundering of cotton knitted fabrics.
Zambrano MC; Pawlak JJ; Daystar J; Ankeny M; Venditti RA
Environ Pollut; 2021 Mar; 272():115998. PubMed ID: 33199065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-contamination by COVID-19 mask microfibers during microlitter analysis of marine biota.
Torre M; Kafritsa ME; Anastasopoulou A
Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Aug; 181():113883. PubMed ID: 35797811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Post COVID-19 pandemic: Biofragmentation and soil ecotoxicological effects of microplastics derived from face masks.
Kwak JI; An YJ
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Aug; 416():126169. PubMed ID: 34492945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection, characterization and possible biofragmentation of synthetic microfibers released from domestic laundering wastewater as an emerging source of marine pollution.
Mishra S; Dash D; Das AP
Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Dec; 185(Pt A):114254. PubMed ID: 36306713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adverse environmental effects of disposable face masks due to the excess usage.
Hui Li AS; Sathishkumar P; Selahuddeen ML; Asyraf Wan Mahmood WM; Zainal Abidin MH; Wahab RA; Mohamed Huri MA; Abdullah F
Environ Pollut; 2022 Sep; 308():119674. PubMed ID: 35772616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconciling human health with the environment while struggling against the COVID-19 pandemic through improved face mask eco-design.
Morone P; Yilan G; Imbert E; Becchetti L
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2445. PubMed ID: 35165351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disposable face masks and reusable face coverings as non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 variants that cause coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Role of new sustainable NPI design innovations and predictive mathematical modelling.
Rowan NJ; Moral RA
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 772():145530. PubMed ID: 33581526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PPE pollution in the terrestrial and aquatic environment of the Chittagong city area associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and concomitant health implications.
Abedin MJ; Khandaker MU; Uddin MR; Karim MR; Ahamad MSU; Islam MA; Arif AM; Sulieman A; Idris AM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(18):27521-27533. PubMed ID: 34981371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation on microfiber release from elastane blended fabrics and its environmental significance.
Rathinamoorthy R; Raja Balasaraswathi S; Madhubashini S; Prakalya A; Rakshana JB; Shathvika S
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 903():166553. PubMed ID: 37633399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can disposable masks be worn more than once?
Chen H; Samet JM; Tong H; Abzhanova A; Rappold AG; Prince SE
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Sep; 242():113908. PubMed ID: 35872486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario.
Aragaw TA
Mar Pollut Bull; 2020 Oct; 159():111517. PubMed ID: 32763564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
