These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34844825)

  • 41. Standardization of acoustic measures for normal voice patterns.
    Naufel de Felippe AC; Grillo MH; Grechi TH
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 72(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 17221059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of Habitual and High Pitch Phonation in Teachers With and Without Vocal Fatigue.
    Thomas SA; Maruthy S
    J Voice; 2022 Jan; 36(1):141.e1-141.e9. PubMed ID: 32417040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Application of voice acoustic analysis of surgical effect in children with benign hyperplastic vocal cord disease].
    Zhou HY; Li YN; Xu G; Cao J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 31(13):1003-1005. PubMed ID: 29798163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers.
    Demirhan E; Unsal EM; Yilmaz C; Ertan E
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e21-5. PubMed ID: 26223964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations in Female Teachers With Functionally Healthy Voice.
    Phadke KV; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Kankare E; Geneid A; Švec JG
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):485.e33-485.e43. PubMed ID: 30342798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Objective Evaluation of Presbyphonia: Spectroacoustic Study on 142 Patients with Praat.
    Mezzedimi C; Di Francesco M; Livi W; Spinosi MC; De Felice C
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e25-257.e32. PubMed ID: 27427181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quality of Voice in Patients With Partial Deafness Before and After Cochlear Implantation.
    Myszel K; Szkiełkowska A
    J Voice; 2022 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 35667987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical relevance of speaking voice intensity effects on acoustic jitter and shimmer in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 78(12):2121-6. PubMed ID: 25441603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Acoustic voice analysis in the COVID-19 era.
    Cavallaro G; Di Nicola V; Quaranta N; Fiorella ML
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2021 Feb; 41(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 33231205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reliable acoustic measurements in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years: Gender, age, height and weight effects on fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer in phonations without and with controlled voice SPL.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2035-42. PubMed ID: 26412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Voice acoustic patterns of patients diagnosed with vibroacoustic disease.
    Mendes A; Alves-Pereira M; Castelo Branco NA
    Rev Port Pneumol; 2006; 12(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 16969570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
    Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Applicability of voice acoustic analysis with vocal loading testto diagnostics of occupational voice diseases].
    Niebudek-Bogusz E; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 17533986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Acoustic Analysis of Voice in School Teachers.
    Mahato NB; Regmi D; Bista M; Sherpa P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2018; 56(211):658-661. PubMed ID: 30381759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Immediate effects of a semi-occluded water-resistance ventilation mask on vocal outcomes in women with dysphonia.
    Kissel I; Papeleu T; Verbeke J; Van Lierde K; Meerschman I; D'haeseleer E
    J Commun Disord; 2023; 103():106331. PubMed ID: 37098295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Acoustic voice analysis in different phonetic contexts after larynx radiotherapy for T1 vocal cord carcinoma.
    Rovirosa A; Ascaso C; Abellana R; Martínez-Celdrán E; Ortega A; Velasco M; Bonet M; Herrero T; Arenas M; Biete A
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2008 Mar; 10(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 18321820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of the voice in patients with vocal polyps after surgery and voice therapy.
    Petrovic-Lazic M; Jovanovic N; Kulic M; Babac S; Jurisic V
    J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 25301300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Vocal characteristics of 5-year-old children: proposed normative values based on a French-speaking population
    Remacle A; Genel Y; Segers M; de Bodt M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Apr; 45(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 30648500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Objective voice analysis for vocal polyps following microlaryngeal phonosurgery.
    Toran KC; Vaidhya BK
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2010; 8(30):185-9. PubMed ID: 21209532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index.
    Maryn Y; Weenink D
    J Voice; 2015 Jan; 29(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 25499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.