These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34844895)

  • 1. Percentile curves of stereacuity in a Spanish paediatric population.
    Navas-Navia B; Garcia-Montero L; Pérez-Sanchez B; Martínez-Pérez C; Villa-Collar C
    J Optom; 2022; 15(3):191-198. PubMed ID: 34844895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual acuity percentile curves in a Spanish paediatric population.
    Navas-Navia B; Garcia-Montero L; Pérez-Sanchez B; Villa-Collar C
    J Optom; 2022; 15(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 33640320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percentile curves of refractive errors in a Spanish paediatric population.
    Martínez-Pérez C; Pérez-Sánchez B; Villa-Collar C
    J Optom; 2023; 16(3):175-181. PubMed ID: 36182658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereoacuity with balanced presbyopic contact lenses.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jan; 94(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 21039847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.
    Yildirim C; Altinsoy HI; Yakut E
    J AAPOS; 1998 Feb; 2(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10532363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.
    Takai Y; Sato M; Tan R; Hirai T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2000 Dec; 4(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 11124670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Cerviño A; Montés-Micó R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 249(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 21061014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The visual function of professional baseball players.
    Laby DM; Rosenbaum AL; Kirschen DG; Davidson JL; Rosenbaum LJ; Strasser C; Mellman MF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1996 Oct; 122(4):476-85. PubMed ID: 8862043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereoacuity development: 6 months to 5 years. A new tool for testing and screening.
    Ciner EB; Schanel-Klitsch E; Herzberg C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jan; 73(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8867681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children.
    Adams WE; Hrisos S; Richardson S; Davis H; Frisby JP; Clarke MP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 89(11):1438-41. PubMed ID: 16234448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical evaluation of random dot stereoacuity cards in infants.
    Calloway SL; Lloyd IC; Henson DB
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Oct; 15(Pt 5):629-34. PubMed ID: 11702975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
    Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interocular Contrast Balancing Partially Improves Stereoacuity in Keratoconus.
    Marella BL; Vaddavalli PK; Reddy JC; Conway ML; Suttle CM; Bharadwaj SR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Apr; 100(4):239-247. PubMed ID: 36856557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereoacuity development in young children.
    Ciner EB; Schanel-Klitsch E; Scheiman M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jul; 68(7):533-6. PubMed ID: 1923324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From suppression to stereoacuity: a composite binocular function score for clinical research.
    Webber AL; Wood JM; Thompson B; Birch EE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 30628744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in adults with acquired strabismus.
    Fawcett SL; Stager DR; Felius J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 15629283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test--retest variability of Randot stereoacuity measures gathered in an unselected sample of UK primary school children.
    Adler P; Scally AJ; Barrett BT
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 96(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 22317911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Borish Vectographic Nearpoint Card II contour and random dot stereoacuity in children.
    Kulp MT
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000; 37(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 10955543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.