These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34846076)

  • 1. Validation of an electronic food intake tool and its usability and efficacy in the healthcare setting.
    Maunder K; Marshall K; Syed K; Smilevska S; Beck E; Mak M; Barrington V
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2022 Jun; 35(3):613-620. PubMed ID: 34846076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record.
    Fallaize R; Forster H; Macready AL; Walsh MC; Mathers JC; Brennan L; Gibney ER; Gibney MJ; Lovegrove JA
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Aug; 16(8):e190. PubMed ID: 25113936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Dietary Intake Using Food Photography and Video Recording in Free-Living Young Adults: A Comparative Study.
    Naaman R; Parrett A; Bashawri D; Campo I; Fleming K; Nichols B; Burleigh E; Murtagh J; Reid J; Gerasimidis K
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Apr; 121(4):749-761.e1. PubMed ID: 33187931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of food intake charts completed by nursing staff as part of usual care when no additional training in completing intake tools is provided.
    Palmer M; Miller K; Noble S
    Clin Nutr; 2015 Aug; 34(4):761-6. PubMed ID: 25234612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energy intake estimation using a novel wearable sensor and food images in a laboratory (pseudo-free-living) meal setting: quantification and contribution of sources of error.
    Doulah A; Ghosh T; Hossain D; Marden T; Parton JM; Higgins JA; McCrory MA; Sazonov E
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2022 Nov; 46(11):2050-2057. PubMed ID: 36192533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the INDDEX24 mobile app
    Rogers B; Somé JW; Bakun P; Adams KP; Bell W; Carroll DA; Wafa S; Coates J
    Br J Nutr; 2022 Nov; 128(9):1817-1831. PubMed ID: 34823617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criterion validity of the visual estimation method for determining patients' meal intake in a community hospital.
    Kawasaki Y; Sakai M; Nishimura K; Fujiwara K; Fujisaki K; Shimpo M; Akamatsu R
    Clin Nutr; 2016 Dec; 35(6):1543-1549. PubMed ID: 27126712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a Tablet Application for Assessing Dietary Intakes Compared with the Measured Food Intake/Food Waste Method in Military Personnel Consuming Field Rations.
    Ahmed M; Mandic I; Lou W; Goodman L; Jacobs I; L'Abbé MR
    Nutrients; 2017 Feb; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 28264428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of improved 24-hour dietary recall using a portable camera among the Japanese population.
    Matsushita Y; Takahashi T; Asahi K; Harashima E; Takahashi H; Tanaka H; Tsumuraya Y; Sarukura N; Furuta M; Tanaka H; Yokoyama T
    Nutr J; 2021 Jul; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 34266425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ji Y; Plourde H; Bouzo V; Kilgour RD; Cohen TR
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e16953. PubMed ID: 32902389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Web-Based Dietary Intake Estimation to Assess the Reproducibility and Relative Validity of the EatWellQ8 Food Frequency Questionnaire: Validation Study.
    Alawadhi B; Fallaize R; Franco RZ; Hwang F; Lovegrove J
    JMIR Form Res; 2021 Mar; 5(3):e13591. PubMed ID: 33650974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a Mobile Phone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.
    Rollo ME; Ash S; Lyons-Wall P; Russell AW
    Nutrients; 2015 Jun; 7(6):4897-910. PubMed ID: 26091234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weekend days are not required to accurately measure oral intake in hospitalised patients.
    Chapple LS; Deane AM; Lange K; Kranz AJ; Williams LT; Chapman MJ
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2017 Jun; 30(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 27709690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the validity of a visual estimation method for determining patients' meal intake between various meal types and supplied food items.
    Kawasaki Y; Akamatsu R; Tamaura Y; Sakai M; Fujiwara K; Tsutsuura S
    Clin Nutr; 2019 Feb; 38(1):213-219. PubMed ID: 29449051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a diet history questionnaire for use with Costa Rican adults.
    Chinnock A
    Public Health Nutr; 2008 Jan; 11(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 17519047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of a food logging app in the naturalistic setting fails to provide accurate measurements of nutrients and poses usability challenges.
    Chen J; Berkman W; Bardouh M; Ng CYK; Allman-Farinelli M
    Nutrition; 2019 Jan; 57():208-216. PubMed ID: 30184514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active Image-Assisted Food Records in Comparison to Regular Food Records: A Validation Study against Doubly Labeled Water in 12-Month-Old Infants.
    Johansson U; Venables M; Öhlund I; Lind T
    Nutrients; 2018 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 30518042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dietary intake in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: validation of the Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies version 2 FFQ against a 3-d weighed food record and 24-h urinalysis.
    Petersen KS; Smith JM; Clifton PM; Keogh JB
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Dec; 114(12):2056-63. PubMed ID: 26423654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the INDDEX24 Dietary Assessment Platform in Viet Nam.
    Coates J; Bell W; Bakun P; Adams KP; Somé JW; Colaiezzi B; Do HTP; Rogers B
    Br J Nutr; 2023 May; 129(10):1751-1764. PubMed ID: 35587720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women of Reproductive Age (MDD-W) Data Collection: Validity of the List-Based and Open Recall Methods as Compared to Weighed Food Record.
    Hanley-Cook GT; Tung JYA; Sattamini IF; Marinda PA; Thong K; Zerfu D; Kolsteren PW; Tuazon MAG; Lachat CK
    Nutrients; 2020 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 32659995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.