182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34847472)
1. Computer simulation based on in vivo kinematics of a replaced hip during chair-rising for elucidating target cup and stem positioning with a safety range of hip rotation.
Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Hara D; Gondo H; Komiyama K; Yoshimoto K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jan; 91():105537. PubMed ID: 34847472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement.
Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
Widmer KH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elucidation of target implant orientations with the safety range of hip rotation with adduction or abduction during squatting: Simulation based on
Harada S; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Hara D; Higaki H; Gondo H; Kawahara S; Shiomoto K; Harada T; Nakashima Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1023721. PubMed ID: 36466333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo kinematics, component alignment and hardware variables influence on the liner-to-neck clearance during chair-rising after total hip arthroplasty.
Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Hara D; Higaki H; Gondo H; Wang Y; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Komiyama K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
J Orthop Sci; 2020 May; 25(3):452-459. PubMed ID: 31178276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
Hisatome T; Doi H
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of optimal implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty based on postoperative range of motion simulation.
Harada S; Hamai S; Motomura G; Ikemura S; Fujii M; Kawahara S; Sato T; Hara D; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Feb; 92():105555. PubMed ID: 35026659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cup safe zone and optimal stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty for patients with highly required range of motion.
Habe Y; Hamada H; Uemura K; Takashima K; Ando W; Sugano N
J Orthop Res; 2024 Jun; 42(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 38084832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of range of motion simulated with a patient-specific three-dimensional simulation analysis on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.
Mitsutake R; Tanino H; Ito H
Hip Int; 2023 Mar; 33(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 34538126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement.
McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The optimal combined anteversion pattern to achieve a favorable impingement-free angle in total hip arthroplasty.
Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Inoue D; Taga T; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Ueoka K; Tsuchiya H
J Orthop Sci; 2019 May; 24(3):474-481. PubMed ID: 30554937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study.
Eslam Pour A; Lazennec JY; Patel KP; Anjaria MP; Beaulé PE; Schwarzkopf R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):818-828. PubMed ID: 35014975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Squatting After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Patient-Reported Outcomes and In Vivo Three-Dimensional Kinematic Study.
Harada S; Hamai S; Gondo H; Higaki H; Ikebe S; Nakashima Y
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Apr; 37(4):734-741. PubMed ID: 34968648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Dimensional Functional Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Debbi EM; Quevedo González FJ; Jerabek SA; Wright TM; Vigdorchik JM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S678-S684. PubMed ID: 35271980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hip Abduction Can Be Considered the Sole Posterior Precaution Strategy to Lower the Rate of Impingement After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Head: A Computer Simulation Study.
Eslam Pour A; Tung WS; Donnelley CA; Tommasini SM; Wiznia DH
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 36709882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
Widmer KH
Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unexpected dislocation following accurate total hip arthroplasty caused by excessive hip joint laxity during myasthenic crisis: a case report.
Murotani Y; Kuroda Y; Goto K; Kawai T; Matsuda S
J Med Case Rep; 2018 Nov; 12(1):331. PubMed ID: 30396362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
