233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34850083)
21. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The experiences of shared decision-making of women who had an induction of labour.
Coates D; Thirukumar P; Henry A
Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Mar; 104(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 32843263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implementation and evaluation of nonclinical interventions for appropriate use of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a multisite hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III trial.
Dumont A; Betrán AP; Kaboré C; de Loenzien M; Lumbiganon P; Bohren MA; Mac QNH; Opiyo N; Carroli G; Annerstedt KS; Ridde V; Escuriet R; Robson M; Hanson C;
Implement Sci; 2020 Sep; 15(1):72. PubMed ID: 32887669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Women's perceptions of childbirth risk and place of birth.
Regan M; McElroy K
J Clin Ethics; 2013; 24(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 24282851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth.
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 133(2):e164-e173. PubMed ID: 30575638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals: a randomized controlled trial.
Hodnett ED; Lowe NK; Hannah ME; Willan AR; Stevens B; Weston JA; Ohlsson A; Gafni A; Muir HA; Myhr TL; Stremler R;
JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1373-81. PubMed ID: 12234231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002.
Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
Birth; 2004 Mar; 31(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15015987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mode of childbirth in low-risk pregnancies: Nicaraguan physicians' viewpoints.
Colomar M; Cafferata ML; Aleman A; Castellano G; Elorrio EG; Althabe F; Engelbrecht S
Matern Child Health J; 2014 Dec; 18(10):2382-92. PubMed ID: 24740720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.
Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):75.e1-75.e6. PubMed ID: 27589899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.
Fitzpatrick KE; Kurinczuk JJ; Bhattacharya S; Quigley MA
PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002913. PubMed ID: 31550245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study.
Dougan C; Gotha L; Melamed N; Aviram A; Asztalos EV; Anabusi S; Willan AR; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):702. PubMed ID: 33203367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contraceptive use and childbirth rates by service branch during the first 24 months on active duty in the United States military from 2013 to 2018: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Roberts TA; Smalley JM; Weir LF; Adelman WP
Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):147-151. PubMed ID: 30998926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of psychosocial support during labour and childbirth on breastfeeding, medical interventions, and mothers' wellbeing in a Mexican public hospital: a randomised clinical trial.
Langer A; Campero L; Garcia C; Reynoso S
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Oct; 105(10):1056-63. PubMed ID: 9800927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trends in birth choices after caesarean section in Japan: A national survey examining information and access to vaginal birth after caesarean.
Torigoe I; Shorten B; Yoshida S; Shorten A
Midwifery; 2016 Jun; 37():49-56. PubMed ID: 27217237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766 Summary: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth.
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 133(2):406-408. PubMed ID: 30681540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Making shared decisions in relation to planned caesarean sections: What are we up to?
Coates D; Thirukumar P; Henry A
Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Jun; 103(6):1176-1190. PubMed ID: 31836248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.
Shorten A; Shorten B; Keogh J; West S; Morris J
Birth; 2005 Dec; 32(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 16336366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do Women Have a Choice? Care Providers' and Decision Makers' Perspectives on Barriers to Access of Health Services for Birth after a Previous Cesarean.
Munro S; Kornelsen J; Corbett K; Wilcox E; Bansback N; Janssen P
Birth; 2017 Jun; 44(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 27917532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
