239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34850083)
41. Quantifying the differences in birth outcomes and out-of-pocket costs between Australian Defence Force servicewomen and civilian women: A data linkage study.
Bull C; Ellwood D; Toohill J; Rigney A; Callander EJ
Women Birth; 2022 Sep; 35(5):e432-e438. PubMed ID: 34802938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Facilitators and Barriers to Contraceptive Use Among U.S. Servicewomen Who Had an Abortion.
Seymour JW; Fix L; Grossman D; Grindlay K
Mil Med; 2019 May; 184(5-6):e417-e423. PubMed ID: 30535236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence.
Eden KB; Hashima JN; Osterweil P; Nygren P; Guise JM
Birth; 2004 Mar; 31(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 15015993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The relationship between personal knowledge and decision self-efficacy in choosing trial of labor after cesarean.
Scaffidi RM; Posmontier B; Bloch JR; Wittmann-Price R
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 24850282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The role of maternity care providers in promoting shared decision making regarding birthing positions during the second stage of labor.
Nieuwenhuijze MJ; Low LK; Korstjens I; Lagro-Janssen T
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 24800933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience.
Handelzalts JE; Waldman Peyser A; Krissi H; Levy S; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169132. PubMed ID: 28046019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Does prolonged labor affect the birth experience and subsequent wish for cesarean section among first-time mothers? A quantitative and qualitative analysis of a survey from Norway.
Gaudernack LC; Michelsen TM; Egeland T; Voldner N; Lukasse M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):605. PubMed ID: 33032529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A Scoping Review of Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Postpartum Period in Active Duty U.S. Military Women.
Iobst SE; Smith DC; Best NI; Allard RJ; Trego LL
Womens Health Issues; 2021 Aug; 31 Suppl 1():S81-S92. PubMed ID: 34454706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Satisfaction in parturients receiving epidural analgesia after prenatal shared decision-making intervention: a prospective, before-and-after cohort study.
Cheng WJ; Hung KC; Ho CH; Yu CH; Chen YC; Wu MP; Chu CC; Chang YJ
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jul; 20(1):413. PubMed ID: 32689958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinicians' Perspectives on Admission of Pregnant Women: A Triad.
Breman RB; Iobst S; Paul J; Low LK
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2019; 44(5):260-268. PubMed ID: 31259757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of shared decision-making in choosing the method of labor analgesia on childbirth experience among primiparous women.
Shahveisi M; Nourizadeh R; Mehrabi E
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0274559. PubMed ID: 36791114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Perspectives on Promoting Hospital Primary Vaginal Birth: A Qualitative Study.
Kennedy HP; Doig E; Tillman S; Strauss A; Williams B; Pettker C; Illuzzi J
Birth; 2016 Dec; 43(4):336-345. PubMed ID: 27500371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Improving the Health and Readiness of Military Women.
Witkop CT; Kostas-Polston EA; Degutis LC
Mil Med; 2023 Mar; 188(Suppl 1):8-14. PubMed ID: 36882034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery.
Coviello EM; Iqbal SN; Grantz KL; Huang CC; Landy HJ; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):100.e1-100.e9. PubMed ID: 30273585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Focused obstetrical clinic for active duty junior enlisted service women: model for improved outcomes.
Calhoun BC; Jennings BM; Peniston J; Patience T; Pulos E; Hume R; Perez R
Mil Med; 2000 Jan; 165(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10658428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Listening to Haitian Women and their Health Care Providers: Insight into Shared Decision-making After Cesarean Section.
Chinkam S; Mezwa K; Pierre KA; Steer-Massaro C; Herbey I; Louis KR; Mars D; Shorten A
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2021; 32(2):931-947. PubMed ID: 34120985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The Mitigation of Racial Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Among U.S. Active Duty Service Women.
Pope J; Banaag A; Madsen C; Hanson T; Khan M; Koehlmoos TP
Mil Med; 2021 Feb; 186(3-4):e373-e378. PubMed ID: 33175967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Applying a physiologic partograph to Consortium on Safe Labor data to identify opportunities for safely decreasing cesarean births among nulliparous women.
Neal JL; Lowe NK; Caughey AB; Bennett KA; Tilden EL; Carlson NS; Phillippi JC; Dietrich MS
Birth; 2018 Dec; 45(4):358-367. PubMed ID: 29851163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.
Horey D; Kealy M; Davey MA; Small R; Crowther CA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; (7):CD010041. PubMed ID: 23897547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effectiveness of birth plan counselling based on shared decision making: A cluster randomized controlled trial (APLANT).
López-Gimeno E; Seguranyes G; Vicente-Hernández M; Burgos Cubero L; Vázquez Garreta G; Falguera-Puig G
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274240. PubMed ID: 36094935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
