These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34850319)

  • 1. Evaluation of ECLIA antigen detection tests as screening methods for COVID-19 in comparison with molecular analysis.
    Kolesova O; Tomassetti F; Cerini P; Finucci D; Turchetti G; Capogreco F; Bernardini S; Calugi G; Pieri M
    Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 191(5):2213-2217. PubMed ID: 34850319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Peshawar.
    Iqbal B; Khan M; Shah N; Dawood MM; Jehanzeb V; Shafi M
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2022 Aug; 9(3):364-368. PubMed ID: 34455727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of the Rapid Antigen Detection Kit with the Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples].
    Erman Daloğlu A; Er H; Sepin Özen N; Çekin Y
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2022 Apr; 56(2):263-273. PubMed ID: 35477229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performance of the fully automated Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay: a pooled analysis.
    Lippi G; Henry BM; Adeli K
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2022 Apr; 60(5):655-661. PubMed ID: 35114742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance of the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.
    Salvagno GL; Pighi L; De Nitto S; Lippi G
    Pract Lab Med; 2022 Mar; 29():e00265. PubMed ID: 35071720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in the clinical routine of a tertiary care hospital: Preliminary results from a single-center evaluation.
    Mueller T; Kompatscher J; La Guardia M
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Aug; 35(8):e23906. PubMed ID: 34251047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen immunoassay for diagnostic of COVID-19.
    Montalvo Villalba MC; Sosa Glaria E; Rodriguez Lay LLA; Valdés Ramirez O; Vallina García D; Arencibia Garcia A; Martinez Alfonso J; Menes Llerena DM; Torres Pérez L; Resik Aguirre SR; Guzman Tirado MG
    J Med Virol; 2022 Mar; 94(3):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 34676585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical performances of the point-of-care SIENNA™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in nasopharyngeal swabs: A prospective evaluation during the COVID-19 second wave in France.
    Mboumba Bouassa RS; Veyer D; Péré H; Bélec L
    Int J Infect Dis; 2021 May; 106():8-12. PubMed ID: 33746093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test.
    Salvagno GL; Gianfilippi G; Bragantini D; Henry BM; Lippi G
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2021 Aug; 8(3):322-326. PubMed ID: 33554511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit.
    Krüttgen A; Cornelissen CG; Dreher M; Hornef MW; Imöhl M; Kleines M
    J Virol Methods; 2021 Feb; 288():114024. PubMed ID: 33227341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head-to-head comparison of two rapid high-throughput automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays targeting total antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and spike protein receptor binding domain.
    Poljak M; Oštrbenk Valenčak A; Štamol T; Seme K
    J Clin Virol; 2021 Apr; 137():104784. PubMed ID: 33711693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen-Based Test Results, Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Values, Subgenomic RNA, and Viral Culture Results From University Testing.
    Ford L; Lee C; Pray IW; Cole D; Bigouette JP; Abedi GR; Bushman D; Delahoy MJ; Currie DW; Cherney B; Kirby MK; Fajardo GC; Caudill M; Langolf K; Kahrs J; Zochert T; Kelly P; Pitts C; Lim A; Aulik N; Tamin A; Harcourt JL; Queen K; Zhang J; Whitaker B; Browne H; Medrzycki M; Shewmaker PL; Bonenfant G; Zhou B; Folster JM; Bankamp B; Bowen MD; Thornburg NJ; Goffard K; Limbago B; Bateman A; Tate JE; Gieryn D; Kirking HL; Westergaard RP; Killerby ME;
    Clin Infect Dis; 2021 Sep; 73(6):e1348-e1355. PubMed ID: 33846714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia on lower respiratory tract specimens.
    De Pace V; Caligiuri P; Ricucci V; Nigro N; Galano B; Visconti V; Da Rin G; Bruzzone B
    BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Sep; 21(1):926. PubMed ID: 34493222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specificity testing by point prevalence as a simple assessment strategy using the Roche Elecsys® anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay.
    Kittel M; Findeisen P; Muth MC; Thiaucourt M; Gerhards C; Neumaier M; Haselmann V
    Int J Infect Dis; 2021 Apr; 105():632-638. PubMed ID: 33578017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for COVID-19 infection with quantitative RT-PCR using 313 nasopharyngeal swabs, including from seven serially followed patients.
    Hirotsu Y; Maejima M; Shibusawa M; Nagakubo Y; Hosaka K; Amemiya K; Sueki H; Hayakawa M; Mochizuki H; Tsutsui T; Kakizaki Y; Miyashita Y; Yagi S; Kojima S; Omata M
    Int J Infect Dis; 2020 Oct; 99():397-402. PubMed ID: 32800855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viral load may impact the diagnostic performance of nasal swabs in nucleic acid amplification test and quantitative antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
    Fujiya Y; Sato Y; Katayama Y; Nirasawa S; Moriai M; Saeki M; Yakuwa Y; Kitayama I; Asanuma K; Kuronuma K; Takahashi S
    J Infect Chemother; 2022 Nov; 28(11):1590-1593. PubMed ID: 35953013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Performance of Six Rapid Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2.
    Navero-Castillejos J; Casals-Pascual C; Narváez S; Cuesta G; Hurtado JC; Fernandez M; Navarro M; Peiró-Mestres A; Lasheras MV; Rodriguez P; Pulgarín A; Marcos MÁ; Vila J; Martínez MJ
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0235121. PubMed ID: 35293799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Diao B; Wen K; Zhang J; Chen J; Han C; Chen Y; Wang S; Deng G; Zhou H; Wu Y
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Feb; 27(2):289.e1-289.e4. PubMed ID: 33031947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective study of 1308 nasopharyngeal swabs from 1033 patients using the LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: Comparison with RT-qPCR.
    Hirotsu Y; Maejima M; Shibusawa M; Amemiya K; Nagakubo Y; Hosaka K; Sueki H; Hayakawa M; Mochizuki H; Tsutsui T; Kakizaki Y; Miyashita Y; Omata M
    Int J Infect Dis; 2021 Apr; 105():7-14. PubMed ID: 33556612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of a Visually-Read Rapid Antigen Test Kit (SGA V-Chek) for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus].
    Kipritci Z; Keskin AÜ; Çıragil P; Topkaya AE
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2021 Jul; 55(3):461-464. PubMed ID: 34416811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.