These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34850648)

  • 1. A pragmatic single centre retrospective comparative review of complication profile between PEEK cages and Zero-P cage screw constructs.
    Balakumar B; Raju S; Marconi SD; Hassan MF
    Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 34850648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.
    Chen Y; Lü G; Wang B; Li L; Kuang L
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2255-62. PubMed ID: 26906171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of contiguous two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a structural allograft versus a Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage: the results of a three-year follow-up.
    Moo IH; Kam CJW; Lai MWS; Yeo W; Soh RCC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 May; 21(1):331. PubMed ID: 32466749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Standalone Versus Cage and Plate Constructs for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
    Fayed I; Conte AG; Keating G; Cobourn KD; Altshuler M; Makariou E; Spitz SM; Anaizi AN; Nair MN; Voyadzis JM; Sandhu FA
    Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Jun; 15(3):403-412. PubMed ID: 33963034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study.
    Wu WJ; Jiang LS; Liang Y; Dai LY
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1374-82. PubMed ID: 22205113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease: Long-term Changes in Sagittal Alignment and Their Clinical Implications After Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage Subsidence: A Prospective Study With Standalone Lordotic Tantalum Cages.
    Tomé-Bermejo F; Morales-Valencia JA; Moreno-Pérez J; Marfil-Pérez J; Díaz-Dominguez E; Piñera AR; Alvarez L
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jun; 30(5):E648-E655. PubMed ID: 28525492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Implant Versus Traditional Interbody Polyetheretherketone Cage, Titanium Plate, and Screw Instrumentation.
    Alhammoud A; Korytkowski PD; Lavelle WF; Tallarico RA
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49246. PubMed ID: 38143630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.
    Barsa P; Suchomel P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Analysis of Cage Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Zero Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) vs. Conventional Cage and Plate Construct.
    Jin ZY; Teng Y; Wang HZ; Yang HL; Lu YJ; Gan MF
    Front Surg; 2021; 8():736680. PubMed ID: 34778358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stand-Alone Cervical Cages in 2-Level Anterior Interbody Fusion in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results from a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.
    Ng EP; Yip AS; Wan KH; Tse MS; Wong KK; Kwok TK; Wong WC
    Asian Spine J; 2019 Apr; 13(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 30472820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Prospective Study with Cage-Only or Cage-with-Plate Fixation in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion of One and Two Levels.
    Kim SY; Yoon SH; Kim D; Oh CH; Oh S
    J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2017 Nov; 60(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 29142629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Interbody Cage Parameters on the Rate of Subsidence in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Retrospective Analysis of 98 Patients.
    Safdar A; Headley B; Rommelman M; Haseeb A; Motiei-Langroudi R
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50386. PubMed ID: 38213336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.
    Li Z; Zhao Y; Tang J; Ren D; Guo J; Wang H; Li L; Hou S
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1129-1139. PubMed ID: 27554353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Dynamic Interbody Cage Improves Bone Formation in Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Porcine Biomechanical Study.
    Yang SH; Xiao FR; Lai DM; Wei CK; Tsuang FY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2547-2558. PubMed ID: 34343157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using titanium-coated polyetheretherketone stand-alone cages: Multicenter prospective study of incidence of cage subsidence.
    Nakanishi Y; Naito K; Yamagata T; Masaki Yoshimura ; Shimokawa N; Nishikawa M; Ohata K; Takami T
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 74():47-54. PubMed ID: 31983642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Retrospective Evaluation and Review of Radiographic Outcomes for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Procedures: Northern Ireland's Experience.
    McKee C; Espey R; O'Halloran A; Curran A; Darwish N
    Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e38864. PubMed ID: 37205174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The improved bioactive n-HA/PA66 cage versus the PEEK cage in anterior cervical fusion: results from a 6-year follow-up and a case-matched study.
    Deng Z; Hu B; Yang X; Wang L; Song Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1113. PubMed ID: 36544134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between Two Different Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages in One Level Stand-alone ACDF: Carbon Fiber Composite Frame Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage.
    Yoo M; Kim WH; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    Korean J Spine; 2014 Sep; 11(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 25346758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.
    Moreland DB; Asch HL; Clabeaux DE; Castiglia GJ; Czajka GA; Lewis PJ; Egnatchik JG; Cappuccino A; Huynh L
    Spine J; 2004; 4(2):184-91; discussion 191. PubMed ID: 15016396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
    Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.