120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34851216)
1. Evaluation of ocular biometric parameters in keratoconic eyes relative to healthy myopic eyes.
Yağmur Kanra A; Uslu H
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; ():11206721211064481. PubMed ID: 34851216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement of keratometric readings measured using rotating Scheimpflug imaging, auto-refractokeratometer, and biograph in eyes with keratoconus.
Altınel MG; Uslu H
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 41(5):1659-1669. PubMed ID: 33544351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes.
Cınar Y; Cingü AK; Sahin M; Sahin A; Yüksel H; Türkcü FM; Cınar T; Caça I
J Ophthalmol; 2013; 2013():481238. PubMed ID: 23986865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameters Between Schiempflug Topography and Swept-Source Optic Coherence Based Optic Biometry in Keratoconus and Healthy Subjects.
Güçlü H; Akaray İ; Kaya S; Sattarpanah S; Çınar AC; Sakallıoğlu K; Korkmaz S; Gürlü V
Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Oct; 47(10):539-545. PubMed ID: 33813587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with LenStar and Pentacam in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma.
Sen E; Inanc M; Elgin U; Yilmazbas P
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 38(1):171-174. PubMed ID: 28108902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements With a Dual Scheimpflug Placido Corneal Topographer and a New Partial Coherence Interferometer in Keratoconic Eyes.
Yağcı R; Kulak AE; Güler E; Tenlik A; Gürağaç FB; Hepşen İF
Cornea; 2015 Sep; 34(9):1012-8. PubMed ID: 26203742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement in anterior segment measurements between swept-source and Scheimpflug-based optical biometries in keratoconic eyes: a pilot study.
Chalkiadaki E; Gartaganis PS; Ntravalias T; Giannakis I; Manousakis E; Karmiris E
Ther Adv Ophthalmol; 2022; 14():25158414211063283. PubMed ID: 35387236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement analysis of Lenstar with other four techniques of biometry before cataract surgery.
Zhang J; Wang Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 42(11):3541-3546. PubMed ID: 35543852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests.
Xu J; Li C; Wang L; Li C; Li X; Lu P
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 20(1):481. PubMed ID: 33287752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth measurements using the manual keratometer, Lenstar LS 900 and the Pentacam.
Uçakhan OÖ; Akbel V; Bıyıklı Z; Kanpolat A
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 24014981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes.
Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 93(6):e488-94. PubMed ID: 25495530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measured using LenStar LS900, Pentacam, and Visante AS-OCT.
OʼDonnell C; Hartwig A; Radhakrishnan H
Cornea; 2012 Sep; 31(9):983-8. PubMed ID: 22367044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between refractive errors and ocular biometric parameters in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang Z; Mu J; Wei J; Geng H; Liu C; Yi W; Sun Y; Duan J
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):472. PubMed ID: 37990308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive comparisons of ocular biometry: A network-based big data analysis.
Yu J; Wen D; Zhao J; Wang Y; Feng K; Wan T; Savini G; McAlinden C; Lin X; Niu L; Chen S; Gao Q; Ning R; Jin Y; Zhou X; Huang J
Eye Vis (Lond); 2022 Dec; 10(1):1. PubMed ID: 36593481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lenstar versus ultrasound for ocular biometry in a pediatric population.
Gursoy H; Sahin A; Basmak H; Ozer A; Yildirim N; Colak E
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):912-9. PubMed ID: 21552178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The utility of measures of anterior segment parameters of a Pentacam Scheimpflug tomographer in discriminating high myopic astigmatism from keratoconus.
Zaabaar E; Kyei S; Parkson Brew MAA; Boadi-Kusi SB; Assiamah F; Asiedu K
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260648. PubMed ID: 34855828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability and agreement between a reference Scheimpflug tomographer and a low-cost Scheimpflug system.
Xu W; Zhai C; Yusufu M; Gan J; Li S; Zheng Y; Kang M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jun; 49(6):614-619. PubMed ID: 36779811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation.
Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Anterior Segment Biometric Measurements between Pentacam HR and IOLMaster in Normal and High Myopic Eyes.
Dong J; Tang M; Zhang Y; Jia Y; Zhang H; Jia Z; Wang X
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143110. PubMed ID: 26575265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
