These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34851979)

  • 21. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. House Republicans were rewarded for supporting Donald Trump's 'stop the steal' efforts.
    Bartels LM; Carnes N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Aug; 120(34):e2309072120. PubMed ID: 37579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of Facebook and Instagram on the 2020 election: A deactivation experiment.
    Allcott H; Gentzkow M; Mason W; Wilkins A; Barberá P; Brown T; Cisneros JC; Crespo-Tenorio A; Dimmery D; Freelon D; González-Bailón S; Guess AM; Kim YM; Lazer D; Malhotra N; Moehler D; Nair-Desai S; Nait El Barj H; Nyhan B; Paixao de Queiroz AC; Pan J; Settle J; Thorson E; Tromble R; Velasco Rivera C; Wittenbrink B; Wojcieszak M; Zahedian S; Franco A; Kiewiet de Jonge C; Stroud NJ; Tucker JA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(21):e2321584121. PubMed ID: 38739793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Political probity increases trust in government: Evidence from randomized survey experiments.
    Martin A; Orr R; Peyton K; Faulkner N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0225818. PubMed ID: 32092084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Registered nurses' perspectives on health care and the 2008 presidential election.
    Buerhaus PI; Ulrich B; Donelan K; DesRoches C
    Nurs Econ; 2008; 26(4):227-35, 257. PubMed ID: 18777971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Has the Supreme Court become just another political branch? Public perceptions of court approval and legitimacy in a post-
    Levendusky M; Patterson S; Margolis M; Pasek J; Winneg K; Jamieson KH
    Sci Adv; 2024 Mar; 10(10):eadk9590. PubMed ID: 38457495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using reappraisal to regulate negative emotion after the 2016 U.S. Presidential election: Does emotion regulation trump political action?
    Ford BQ; Feinberg M; Lam P; Mauss IB; John OP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Nov; 117(5):998-1015. PubMed ID: 29952576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Did the COVID-19 pandemic help or hurt Donald Trump's political fortunes?
    Hart J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247664. PubMed ID: 33626568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The politics of abortion rights in the 2022 United States midterm election: Lessons for fledgling democracies around the world.
    Balogun JA; Okonofua F
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2023 Feb; 27(2):9-25. PubMed ID: 37584935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The political polarization of physicians in the United States: an analysis of campaign contributions to federal elections, 1991 through 2012.
    Bonica A; Rosenthal H; Rothman DJ
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 174(8):1308-17. PubMed ID: 24887456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Volatility in Expectations While Awaiting Important News.
    Wilson M; Sweeny K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jul; 50(7):1040-1050. PubMed ID: 36942928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Political differences in past, present, and future life satisfaction: Republicans are more sensitive than democrats to political climate.
    Mandel DR; Omorogbe P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98854. PubMed ID: 24901253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nigeria's 2023 presidential election and the future of healthcare in the country.
    Okonofua FE; Balogun JA
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2023 Mar; 27(3):9-18. PubMed ID: 37584966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicted and experienced affective responses to the outcome of the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Kitchens MB; Corser GC; Gohm CL; VonWaldner KL; Foreman EL
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Dec; 107(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 21323142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Polarization and Democratic Accountability in the 2020 Presidential Election.
    Bitecofer RL
    Society; 2020; 57(5):507-510. PubMed ID: 33144744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Testosterone fluctuations in response to a democratic election predict partisan attitudes toward the elected leader.
    Prasad S; Knight EL; Sarkar A; Welker KM; Lassetter B; Mehta PH
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2021 Nov; 133():105396. PubMed ID: 34508970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.