158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34851999)
1. Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis.
Park JS; Kim DW; Lee D; Lee T; Koo KC; Han WK; Chung BH; Lee KS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260517. PubMed ID: 34851999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Novel Indicator of Spontaneous Ureter Stone Passage.
Lee KS; Ha JS; Koo KC
Yonsei Med J; 2017 Sep; 58(5):988-993. PubMed ID: 28792143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: Automated 3D-measurements perform equal to radiologists, and linear measurements equal to volumetric.
Jendeberg J; Geijer H; Alshamari M; Lidén M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2474-2483. PubMed ID: 29368161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Algorithm for Assessing Stone-Free Status after Single Session Shock Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones.
Choo MS; Uhmn S; Kim JK; Han JH; Kim DH; Kim J; Lee SH
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1371-1377. PubMed ID: 30036513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Size matters: The width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage.
Jendeberg J; Geijer H; Alshamari M; Cierzniak B; Lidén M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4775-4785. PubMed ID: 28593428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inflammatory serum markers predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage.
Abou Heidar N; Labban M; Bustros G; Nasr R
Clin Exp Nephrol; 2020 Mar; 24(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 31705331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of spontaneous distal ureteral stone passage using artificial intelligence.
Aksakalli T; Aksakalli IK; Cinislioglu AE; Utlu A; Demirdogen SO; Celik F; Karabulut I
Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Jul; 56(7):2179-2186. PubMed ID: 38340263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of factors affecting spontaneous expulsion of ureteral stones that may predict unfavorable outcomes during watchful waiting periods: What is the influence of diabetes mellitus on the ureter?
Choi T; Yoo KH; Choi SK; Kim DS; Lee DG; Min GE; Jeon SH; Lee HL; Jeong IK
Korean J Urol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):455-60. PubMed ID: 26078843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.
Selvi I; Baydilli N; Tokmak TT; Akinsal EC; Basar H
Urolithiasis; 2021 Jun; 49(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 32980972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic.
Mutlu H; Sert ET; Kokulu K; Kankılıç NA
Postgrad Med; 2024 Apr; 136(3):325-330. PubMed ID: 38669143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spontaneous ureteral stone passage: a novel and comprehensive nomogram.
Abou Heidar N; Labban M; Najdi J; Al Shami A; Nasrallah O; Nasr R
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Feb; 74(1):102-109. PubMed ID: 33439574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report.
Yoshida T; Inoue T; Taguchi M; Omura N; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):913-919. PubMed ID: 30155728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective evaluation of patient-reported outcomes during follow-up of ureteral stones managed with medical expulsive treatment (MET).
Pandey A; Mandal S; Kumaraswamy S; Gaur AS; Das MK; Nayak P
Urolithiasis; 2023 Mar; 51(1):56. PubMed ID: 36943497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.
Park HS; Gong MK; Yoon CY; Moon du G; Cheon J; Choi YD
J Endourol; 2016 Jul; 30(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 27042952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting Spontaneous Stone Passage in Prepubertal Children: A Single Institution Cohort.
Dangle P; Ayyash O; Shaikh H; Stephany HA; Cannon GM; Schneck FX; Ost MC
J Endourol; 2016 Sep; 30(9):945-9. PubMed ID: 27404555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The predictive value of ureteral wall area for impacted ureteral stones].
Qi W; Xi JH; Yang XL; Wu W; Xu ZL; Jing JF; Ni DW; Chen Y; Wang W; Zhang YB
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 101(44):3637-3642. PubMed ID: 34823280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.
Coll DM; Varanelli MJ; Smith RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 11756098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for uncomplicated ureteral stone--the STONE score: retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies.
Moore CL; Bomann S; Daniels B; Luty S; Molinaro A; Singh D; Gross CP
BMJ; 2014 Mar; 348():g2191. PubMed ID: 24671981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Internal validation of a scoring system to evaluate the probability of ureteral stones: The CHOKAI score.
Fukuhara H; Ichiyanagi O; Midorikawa S; Kakizaki H; Kaneko H; Tsuchiya N
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1859-1866. PubMed ID: 28633903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT-based determination of maximum ureteral stone area: a predictor of spontaneous passage.
Demehri S; Steigner ML; Sodickson AD; Houseman EA; Rybicki FJ; Silverman SG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 22357999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
