These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34852277)

  • 1. Spatial sampling of MEG and EEG based on generalized spatial-frequency analysis and optimal design.
    Iivanainen J; Mäkinen AJ; Zetter R; Stenroos M; Ilmoniemi RJ; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118747. PubMed ID: 34852277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing MEG and high-density EEG for intrinsic functional connectivity mapping.
    Coquelet N; De Tiège X; Destoky F; Roshchupkina L; Bourguignon M; Goldman S; Peigneux P; Wens V
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116556. PubMed ID: 31972279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unified Expression of the Quasi-Static Electromagnetic Field: Demonstration With MEG and EEG Signals.
    Taulu S; Larson E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Mar; 68(3):992-1004. PubMed ID: 32746058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarities between simulated spatial spectra of scalp EEG, MEG and structural MRI.
    Ramon C; Freeman WJ; Holmes M; Ishimaru A; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH; Rezvanian E
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Nov; 22(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 19557510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial filter approach for comparison of the forward and inverse problems of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Bradshaw LA; Wijesinghe RS; Wikswo JP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Mar; 29(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 11310783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
    Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con.
    Baumgartner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 May; 115(5):1010-20. PubMed ID: 15066524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On-scalp MEG SQUIDs are sensitive to early somatosensory activity unseen by conventional MEG.
    Andersen LM; Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Riaz B; Winkler D; Schneiderman JF; Lundqvist D
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117157. PubMed ID: 32659354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal design of on-scalp electromagnetic sensor arrays for brain source localisation.
    Beltrachini L; von Ellenrieder N; Eichardt R; Haueisen J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(15):4869-4879. PubMed ID: 34245061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).
    Hari R; Baillet S; Barnes G; Burgess R; Forss N; Gross J; Hämäläinen M; Jensen O; Kakigi R; Mauguière F; Nakasato N; Puce A; Romani GL; Schnitzler A; Taulu S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Aug; 129(8):1720-1747. PubMed ID: 29724661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
    Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The application of magnetoencephalography versus scalp electroencephalography in intractable temporal lobe epilepsy].
    Zhang N; Qiao H; Wang YJ; Sun B; Feng YG; Shu N
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2007 May; 46(5):370-2. PubMed ID: 17637302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scalp ripples as prognostic biomarkers of epileptogenicity in pediatric surgery.
    Tamilia E; Dirodi M; Alhilani M; Grant PE; Madsen JR; Stufflebeam SM; Pearl PL; Papadelis C
    Ann Clin Transl Neurol; 2020 Mar; 7(3):329-342. PubMed ID: 32096612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.