233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34852320)
21. Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chang W; Yuwen P; Zhu Y; Wei N; Feng C; Zhang Y; Chen W
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 May; 137(5):637-650. PubMed ID: 28361467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative outcome analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in lumbar fusion surgery.
Sekerak R; Mostafa E; Morris MT; Nessim A; Vira A; Sharan A
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 Feb; 13():122-126. PubMed ID: 33680810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adoption of awake spine surgery - trends from a national registry over 14 years.
Azad TD; Alomari S; Khalifeh JM; Ahmed AK; Musharbash FN; Mo K; Lubelski D; Witham TF; Bydon A; Theodore N
Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 35525378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Awake minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a pedicle-based retraction system.
De Biase G; Bechtle P; Leone B; Quinones-Hinojosa A; Abode-Iyamah K
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Jan; 200():106313. PubMed ID: 33139086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of Spinal/Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Shui M; Zhao D; Xue Z; Wu A
Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Jul; 36(6):227-236. PubMed ID: 35943881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endoscopic transforaminal decompression, interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation of the lumbar spine: A case series report.
Osman SG
Int J Spine Surg; 2012; 6():157-66. PubMed ID: 25694885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery.
Lessing NL; Edwards CC; Brown CH; Ledford EC; Dean CL; Lin C; Edwards CC
Orthopedics; 2017 Mar; 40(2):e317-e322. PubMed ID: 28027388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery.
Hofstetter CP; Hofer AS; Levi AD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):457-75. PubMed ID: 26613283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Meta-analysis of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs. fenestration discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.
Ding W; Yin J; Yan T; Nong L; Xu N
Orthopade; 2018 Jul; 47(7):574-584. PubMed ID: 29404628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case-controlled analysis of 400 patients.
McLain RF; Kalfas I; Bell GR; Tetzlaff JE; Yoon HJ; Rana M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Jan; 2(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 15658121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: a review of the modern literature.
De Rojas JO; Syre P; Welch WC
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Apr; 119():39-43. PubMed ID: 24635923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(10):1-98. PubMed ID: 23074480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel technique for awake, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note.
Kai-Hong Chan A; Choy W; Miller CA; Robinson LC; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E16. PubMed ID: 30933917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system.
Xiao R; Miller JA; Sabharwal NC; Lubelski D; Alentado VJ; Healy AT; Mroz TE; Benzel EC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):628-637. PubMed ID: 28291408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient-specific factors affecting hospital costs in lumbar spine surgery.
Puffer RC; Planchard R; Mallory GW; Clarke MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26360143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spinal anesthesia in contemporary and complex lumbar spine surgery: experience with 343 cases.
Breton JM; Ludwig CG; Yang MJ; Nail TJ; Riesenburger RI; Liu P; Kryzanski JT
J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Apr; 36(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 34740182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Surgical Outcomes After Single-Level Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Stone CE; Myers BL; Gupta S; Giles TX; Patel NA; Gendreau JL; Abraham ME; Mammis A
Cureus; 2020 Oct; 12(10):e11052. PubMed ID: 33224649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
