These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34852611)

  • 1. Double-pass consistency for amplitude- and frequency-modulation detection in normal-hearing listeners.
    Attia S; King A; Varnet L; Ponsot E; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3631. PubMed ID: 34852611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation).
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2468-78. PubMed ID: 7714263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of noise reduction on AM and FM perception.
    Ives DT; Calcus A; Kalluri S; Strelcyk O; Sheft S; Lorenzi C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 14(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23180229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for masking of frequency modulation by amplitude modulation with the modulation filter-bank concept.
    King A; Varnet L; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2277. PubMed ID: 31046322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related reduction of amplitude modulation frequency selectivity.
    Regev J; Zaar J; Relaño-Iborra H; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Apr; 153(4):2298. PubMed ID: 37092934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation or frequency modulation) with and without background noise.
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):726-32. PubMed ID: 7930073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Second-order modulation detection thresholds for pure-tone and narrow-band noise carriers.
    Lorenzi C; Simpson MI; Millman RE; Griffiths TD; Woods WP; Rees A; Green GG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2470-8. PubMed ID: 11757936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking.
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2320-31. PubMed ID: 8865639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3119-31. PubMed ID: 1474227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External and internal limitations in amplitude-modulation processing.
    Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):478-90. PubMed ID: 15296007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC; Skrodzka E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):327-35. PubMed ID: 11833538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between amplitude modulation and frequency modulation processing: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Paraouty N; Ewert SD; Wallaert N; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):121. PubMed ID: 27475138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Further evidence against an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of frequency modulation (FM) incoherence between resolved frequency components.
    Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):949-61. PubMed ID: 8132909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of noise precursors on the detection of amplitude and frequency modulation for tones in noise.
    Mesik J; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Dec; 148(6):3581. PubMed ID: 33379905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus.
    Paul BT; Bruce IC; Roberts LE
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():170-182. PubMed ID: 27888040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency modulation detection with simultaneous amplitude modulation by cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1046-54. PubMed ID: 17672652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrimination of the phase of amplitude modulation applied to different carriers: Effects of modulation rate and modulation depth for young and older subjects.
    Moore BCJ; Sęk AP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Sep; 146(3):1696. PubMed ID: 31590555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probing temporal modulation detection in white noise using intrinsic envelope fluctuations: A reverse-correlation study.
    Varnet L; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1353. PubMed ID: 35232105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes.
    Füllgrabe C; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 178(1-2):35-43. PubMed ID: 12684175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2314082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.