These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34852619)

  • 21. The clear speech effect for non-native listeners.
    Bradlow AR; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):272-84. PubMed ID: 12141353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Judgments of Emotion in Clear and Conversational Speech by Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.
    Morgan SD; Ferguson SH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2271-2280. PubMed ID: 28687824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Within-talker and within-session stability of acoustic characteristics of conversational and clear speaking stylesa).
    Ferguson SH; Morgan SD; Hunter EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jan; 155(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 38174965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 25166628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
    Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new method for eliciting three speaking styles in the laboratory.
    Harnsberger JD; Wright R; Pisoni DB
    Speech Commun; 2008 Apr; 50(4):323-336. PubMed ID: 19562041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.
    Bradlow AR; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2074-85. PubMed ID: 10530030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of Hearing Loss and Cognitive Load on Speech Recognition with Competing Talkers.
    Meister H; Schreitmüller S; Ortmann M; Rählmann S; Walger M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():301. PubMed ID: 26973585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J; Wang X; Wang NY; Fu X; Gan T; Galvin JJ; Willis S; Xu K; Thomas M; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure.
    Strori D; Bradlow AR; Souza PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3765. PubMed ID: 32611135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Listening effort during speech perception enhances auditory and lexical processing for non-native listeners and accents.
    Song J; Iverson P
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():163-170. PubMed ID: 29957515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
    Calandruccio L; Van Engen K; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.
    Lim SJ; Carter YD; Njoroge JM; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Brain Lang; 2021 Oct; 221():104996. PubMed ID: 34358924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.