These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34852619)

  • 41. Nonnative Accent Discrimination with Words and Sentences.
    Atagi E; Bent T
    Phonetica; 2017; 74(3):173-191. PubMed ID: 28268232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.
    Picheny MA; Durlach NI; Braida LD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 3982003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate.
    Uchanski RM; Choi SS; Braida LD; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):494-509. PubMed ID: 8783129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Learning individual talkers' structural preferences.
    Kamide Y
    Cognition; 2012 Jul; 124(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 22498776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.
    Martin CS; Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Summers WV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 2526857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Xu A; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 23238527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Building syntactic structures in speaking: a bilingual exploration.
    Meijer PJ; Tree JE
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(3):184-95. PubMed ID: 12874987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.
    Bradlow AR; Bent T
    Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):707-29. PubMed ID: 17532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.
    Bradlow AR; Kraus N; Hayes E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Feb; 46(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 12647890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Face masks and speaking style affect audio-visual word recognition and memory of native and non-native speech.
    Smiljanic R; Keerstock S; Meemann K; Ransom SM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jun; 149(6):4013. PubMed ID: 34241444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of listener age and native language on perception of accented and unaccented sentences.
    Bieber RE; Yeni-Komshian GH; Freund MS; Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Dec; 144(6):3191. PubMed ID: 30599683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Child, Young Adult, and Older Adult Talkers.
    Smiljanic R; Gilbert RC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3069-3080. PubMed ID: 29075748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus Sensitivity to Phonetic Competition in Receptive Language Processing: A Comparison of Clear and Conversational Speech.
    Xie X; Myers E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 30(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 29160743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis.
    Stibbard RM; Lee JI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):433-42. PubMed ID: 16875239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Auditory and auditory-visual perception of clear and conversational speech.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 40(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 9130211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.