These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3485337)

  • 1. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers.
    Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Apr; 146(4):661-3. PubMed ID: 3485337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic features of "early" breast cancer.
    Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Sep; 143(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 6331721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonpalpable breast cancer: mammographic appearance as predictor of histologic type.
    Thurfjell MG; Lindgren A; Thurfjell E
    Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 11756721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
    Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic features of malignancy found during screening.
    Sickles EA
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():88-93. PubMed ID: 2236867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic appearance of cancer in the opposite breast: comparison with the first cancer.
    Roubidoux MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C; Joynt LK; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8571898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonpalpable breast lesions: accuracy of prebiopsy mammographic diagnosis.
    Hermann G; Janus C; Schwartz IS; Krivisky B; Bier S; Rabinowitz JG
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 3659350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic features of screening detected pT1 (a-b) invasive breast cancer using BI-RADS lexicon.
    Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Velasco M; del Amo M; Arguis P; Burrel M; Capurro S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2620-6. PubMed ID: 22206831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances.
    Ikeda DM; Andersson I
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):661-6. PubMed ID: 2549563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invasive lobular carcinoma. Mammographic pattern.
    Adler OB; Engel A
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):460-2. PubMed ID: 2160109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Specimen radiography and preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast cancer.
    Snyder RE
    Cancer; 1980 Aug; 46(4 Suppl):950-6. PubMed ID: 7397674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
    Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
    Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer in the elderly patient: early detection with mammography.
    Wilson TE; Helvie MA; August DA
    Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):203-7. PubMed ID: 8259405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation into the mammographic appearances of missed breast cancers when recall rates are reduced.
    Mohd Norsuddin N; Mello-Thoms C; Reed W; Rickard M; Lewis S
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 90(1076):20170048. PubMed ID: 28621548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wire-guided biopsies of nonpalpable breast lesions.
    Ahovuo J; Kinnunen J; von Smitten K; Edgren J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1990; 79(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 2386362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mode of presentation, mammographic appearance, and frequency of nodal metastases.
    Elson BC; Helvie MA; Frank TS; Wilson TE; Adler DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1173-6. PubMed ID: 8249721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography of breast carcinoma: experience of 108 cases.
    Ng SH; Ko SF; Lee CM; Pai SC; Tsai CC; Chen SC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1991 Jun; 90(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 1680998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic features predicting an extensive intraductal component in early-stage infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
    Stomper PC; Connolly JL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 1309620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography of the postsurgical breast.
    Sickles EA; Herzog KA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Mar; 136(3):585-8. PubMed ID: 6781299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.