These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34854070)

  • 1. Can cue familiarity during recall failure prompt illusory recollective experience?
    Huebert AM; McNeely-White KL; Cleary AM
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):681-695. PubMed ID: 34854070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of cue familiarity during retrieval failure is affected by past versus future orientation.
    Cleary AM
    Memory; 2015; 23(4):590-601. PubMed ID: 24786966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.
    Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State-dependent effects of alcohol on recollective experience, familiarity and awareness of memories.
    Duka T; Weissenborn R; Dienes Z
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Jan; 153(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 11271401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recollection versus strength as the primary determinant of hippocampal engagement at retrieval.
    Cohn M; Moscovitch M; Lahat A; McAndrews MP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Dec; 106(52):22451-5. PubMed ID: 20007783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Varieties of recollective experience.
    Kihlstrom JF
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107295. PubMed ID: 31811844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiarity is related to conceptual implicit memory: an examination of individual differences.
    Wang WC; Yonelinas AP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1154-64. PubMed ID: 22833341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the relationship between tip-of-the-tongue states and partial recollective experience: Illusory partial recollective access during tip-of-the-tongue states.
    Huebert AM; McNeely-White KL; Cleary AM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Feb; 152(2):542-570. PubMed ID: 36048055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Components of recollective experience in cued recall.
    Mäntylä T
    Scand J Psychol; 1994 Sep; 35(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 7939488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of recollection and familiarity in the formation and updating of associative representations.
    Ozubko JD; Moscovitch M; Winocur G
    Learn Mem; 2017 Jul; 24(7):298-309. PubMed ID: 28620077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Encoding-related brain activity dissociates between the recollective processes underlying successful recall and recognition: a subsequent-memory study.
    Sadeh T; Maril A; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2317-24. PubMed ID: 22683451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "What-Where-Which" Episodic Retrieval Requires Conscious Recollection and Is Promoted by Semantic Knowledge.
    Saive AL; Royet JP; Garcia S; Thévenet M; Plailly J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143767. PubMed ID: 26630170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mis-attribution errors in Alzheimer's disease: the illusory truth effect.
    Mitchell JP; Sullivan AL; Schacter DL; Budson AE
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Mar; 20(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 16594779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amount, not strength of recollection, drives hippocampal activity: A problem for apparent word familiarity-related hippocampal activation.
    Mayes AR; Montaldi D; Roper A; Migo EM; Gholipour T; Kafkas A
    Hippocampus; 2019 Jan; 29(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 30411437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does context discriminate recollection from familiarity in recognition memory?
    Perfect TJ; Mayes AR; Downes JJ; Van Eijk R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Aug; 49(3):797-813. PubMed ID: 8828405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ability of familiarity, disruption, and the relative strength of nonenvironmental context cues to explain unreliable environmental-context-dependent memory effects in free recall.
    Rutherford A
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Dec; 28(8):1419-28. PubMed ID: 11219969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of self-referencing on feeling-of-knowing accuracy and recollective experience.
    Boduroglu A; Pehlivanoglu D; Tekcan AI; Kapucu A
    Memory; 2015; 23(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 24936954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.
    Schwartz BL; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1074-83. PubMed ID: 1402711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive aging: a common decline of episodic recollection and spatial memory in rats.
    Robitsek RJ; Fortin NJ; Koh MT; Gallagher M; Eichenbaum H
    J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(36):8945-54. PubMed ID: 18768688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.