267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34854983)
1. When eyes beat lips: speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion.
Wahn B; Schmitz L; Kingstone A; Böckler-Raettig A
Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1930-1943. PubMed ID: 34854983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increasing audiovisual speech integration in autism through enhanced attention to mouth.
Feng S; Wang Q; Hu Y; Lu H; Li T; Song C; Fang J; Chen L; Yi L
Dev Sci; 2023 Jul; 26(4):e13348. PubMed ID: 36394129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face-viewing patterns predict audiovisual speech integration in autistic children.
Feng S; Lu H; Wang Q; Li T; Fang J; Chen L; Yi L
Autism Res; 2021 Dec; 14(12):2592-2602. PubMed ID: 34415113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the speaker's eye gaze facilitate infants' word segmentation from continuous speech? An ERP study.
Çetinçelik M; Rowland CF; Snijders TM
Dev Sci; 2024 Mar; 27(2):e13436. PubMed ID: 37551932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.
Kaplan E; Jesse A
Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107724. PubMed ID: 31323242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eye Gaze and Perceptual Adaptation to Audiovisual Degraded Speech.
Banks B; Gowen E; Munro KJ; Adank P
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 64(9):3432-3445. PubMed ID: 34463528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Social eye gaze modulates processing of speech and co-speech gesture.
Holler J; Schubotz L; Kelly S; Hagoort P; Schuetze M; Özyürek A
Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 25255036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.
Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y
J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The other-race effect on the McGurk effect in infancy.
Ujiie Y; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2924-2936. PubMed ID: 34386882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metacognition in the audiovisual McGurk illusion: perceptual and causal confidence.
Meijer D; Noppeney U
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Sep; 378(1886):20220348. PubMed ID: 37545307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of co-speech gestures in aphasic patients: a visual exploration study during the observation of dyadic conversations.
Preisig BC; Eggenberger N; Zito G; Vanbellingen T; Schumacher R; Hopfner S; Nyffeler T; Gutbrod K; Annoni JM; Bohlhalter S; Müri RM
Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():157-68. PubMed ID: 25461716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multimodal integration in statistical learning: evidence from the McGurk illusion.
Mitchel AD; Christiansen MH; Weiss DJ
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():407. PubMed ID: 24904449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Demystifying infant vocal imitation: The roles of mouth looking and speaker's gaze.
Imafuku M; Kanakogi Y; Butler D; Myowa M
Dev Sci; 2019 Nov; 22(6):e12825. PubMed ID: 30980494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.
Van Engen KJ; Dey A; Sommers MS; Peelle JE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3216. PubMed ID: 36586857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.
Getz LM; Toscano JC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2583-2598. PubMed ID: 33884572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
