These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34854983)
41. Lip-Reading Enables the Brain to Synthesize Auditory Features of Unknown Silent Speech. Bourguignon M; Baart M; Kapnoula EC; Molinaro N J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 31889007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Primary and multisensory cortical activity is correlated with audiovisual percepts. Benoit MM; Raij T; Lin FH; Jääskeläinen IP; Stufflebeam S Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Apr; 31(4):526-38. PubMed ID: 19780040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study. Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The contribution of dynamic visual cues to audiovisual speech perception. Jaekl P; Pesquita A; Alsius A; Munhall K; Soto-Faraco S Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():402-10. PubMed ID: 26100561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Read my lips: asymmetries in the visual expression and perception of speech revealed through the McGurk effect. Nicholls ME; Searle DA; Bradshaw JL Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 14738522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Suggestion overrides automatic audiovisual integration. Déry C; Campbell NK; Lifshitz M; Raz A Conscious Cogn; 2014 Feb; 24():33-7. PubMed ID: 24398260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The road to understanding is paved with the speaker's intentions: cues to the speaker's attention and intentions affect pronoun comprehension. Nappa R; Arnold JE Cogn Psychol; 2014 May; 70():58-81. PubMed ID: 24534295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information. Buchan JN; Munhall KG Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A study of lip movements during spontaneous dialog and its application to voice activity detection. Sodoyer D; Rivet B; Girin L; Savariaux C; Schwartz JL; Jutten C J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1184-96. PubMed ID: 19206891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Theta oscillations reflect conflict processing in the perception of the McGurk illusion. Morís Fernández L; Torralba M; Soto-Faraco S Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2630-2641. PubMed ID: 29250857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of infant bilingualism on audiovisual integration in a McGurk task. Mercure E; Bright P; Quiroz I; Filippi R J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 May; 217():105351. PubMed ID: 35093667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]