These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34855228)
1. Incorporating artificial intelligence in urology: Supervised machine learning algorithms demonstrate comparative advantage over nomograms in predicting biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. Tan YG; Fang AHS; Lim JKS; Khalid F; Chen K; Ho HSS; Yuen JSP; Huang HH; Tay KJ Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 34855228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning algorithms can more efficiently predict biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ekşi M; Evren İ; Akkaş F; Arıkan Y; Özdemir O; Özlü DN; Ayten A; Sahin S; Tuğcu V; Taşçı AI Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):913-920. PubMed ID: 34224165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy. Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. Brockman JA; Alanee S; Vickers AJ; Scardino PT; Wood DP; Kibel AS; Lin DW; Bianco FJ; Rabah DM; Klein EA; Ciezki JP; Gao T; Kattan MW; Stephenson AJ Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1160-1167. PubMed ID: 25301759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do nomograms designed to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) do a better job of predicting more clinically relevant prostate cancer outcomes than BCR? A report from the SEARCH database group. Teeter AE; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ Urology; 2013 Jul; 82(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 23806388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are biochemical recurrence outcomes similar after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy? Analysis of prostate cancer-specific mortality by nomogram-predicted risks of biochemical recurrence. Lee BH; Kibel AS; Ciezki JP; Klein EA; Reddy CA; Yu C; Kattan MW; Stephenson AJ Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 25294696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer. Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pre- and post-operative nomograms to predict recurrence-free probability in korean men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Kang M; Jeong CW; Choi WS; Park YH; Cho SY; Lee S; Lee SB; Ku JH; Hong SK; Byun SS; Jeong H; Kwak C; Kim HH; Lee E; Lee SE; PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100053. PubMed ID: 24936784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A validation of two preoperative nomograms predicting recurrence following radical prostatectomy in a cohort of European men. Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Cagiannos I; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Fernandez S; Noldus J; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW Urol Oncol; 2002; 7(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 12474529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate MRI added to CAPRA, MSKCC and Partin cancer nomograms significantly enhances the prediction of adverse findings and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Sandeman K; Eineluoto JT; Pohjonen J; Erickson A; Kilpeläinen TP; Järvinen P; Santti H; Petas A; Matikainen M; Marjasuo S; Kenttämies A; Mirtti T; Rannikko A PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235779. PubMed ID: 32645056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting survival of men with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Dell'Oglio P; Suardi N; Boorjian SA; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Tian Z; Moschini M; Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A Eur J Cancer; 2016 Feb; 54():27-34. PubMed ID: 26707594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of Risk Models in Decision Making After Radical Prostatectomy: Lessons from a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men. Ross AE; Yousefi K; Davicioni E; Ghadessi M; Johnson MH; Sundi D; Tosoian JJ; Han M; Humphreys EB; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 25922274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative prostate-specific antigen nadir improves accuracy for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) and Duke Prostate Center databases. Moreira DM; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Sun LL; Moul JW; Freedland SJ Int J Urol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):914-22. PubMed ID: 20880361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External validation of preoperative nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Tanaka A; Ohori M; Paul L; Yu C; Kattan MW; Ohno Y; Tachibana M Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 43(12):1255-60. PubMed ID: 24146147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic predisposition to early recurrence in clinically localized prostate cancer. Borque Á; del Amo J; Esteban LM; Ars E; Hernández C; Planas J; Arruza A; Llarena R; Palou J; Herranz F; Raventós CX; Tejedor D; Artieda M; Simon L; Martínez A; Carceller E; Suárez M; Allué M; Sanz G; Morote J BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 22759231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of machine learning to predict early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted prostatectomy. Wong NC; Lam C; Patterson L; Shayegan B BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 29969172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel nomogram provides improved accuracy for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Xia HZ; Bi H; Yan Y; Yang B; Ma RZ; He W; Zhu XH; Zhang ZY; Zhang YT; Ma LL; Hou XF; Wirth GJ; Lu J Chin Med J (Engl); 2021 Jun; 134(13):1576-1583. PubMed ID: 34133352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do nomograms predict aggressive recurrence after radical prostatectomy more accurately than biochemical recurrence alone? Schroeck FR; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ BJU Int; 2009 Mar; 103(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 19021608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External validation of two web-based postoperative nomograms predicting the probability of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Yoneda K; Utsumi T; Somoto T; Wakai K; Oka R; Endo T; Yano M; Kamiya N; Hiruta N; Suzuki H Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Feb; 48(2):195-199. PubMed ID: 29228232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer. Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]