These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34855597)

  • 1. Completely Blind Quality Assessment of User Generated Video Content.
    Kancharla P; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():263-274. PubMed ID: 34855597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content.
    Tu Z; Wang Y; Birkbeck N; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():4449-4464. PubMed ID: 33856995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Efficient Method for No-Reference Video Quality Assessment.
    Agarla M; Celona L; Schettini R
    J Imaging; 2021 Mar; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 34460711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-Dimensional Feature Fusion Network for No-Reference Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos.
    Jiang J; Wang X; Li B; Tian M; Yao H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the Quality of Compressed Videos With Pre-Existing Distortions.
    Yu X; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Bampis CG; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():7511-7526. PubMed ID: 34460374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Completely Blind Video Integrity Oracle.
    Mittal A; Saad MA; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jan; 25(1):289-300. PubMed ID: 26599970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using the Temporal Statistics of Global and Local Image Features.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No-Reference Quality Assessment of In-Capture Distorted Videos.
    Agarla M; Celona L; Schettini R
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blind VQA on 360° Video via Progressively Learning from Pixels, Frames and Video.
    Yang L; Xu M; Li S; Guo Y; Wang Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022 Dec; PP():. PubMed ID: 37015524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blind prediction of natural video quality.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1352-65. PubMed ID: 24723532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos.
    Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1027-1041. PubMed ID: 34951848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Natural Spatiotemporal Scene Statistics.
    Dendi SVR; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 32275592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effects of User Engagements for User and Company Generated Videos on Music Sales: Empirical Evidence From YouTube.
    Park J; Park J; Park J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1880. PubMed ID: 30344501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "In the Wild" Video Content as a Special Case of User Generated Content and a System for Its Recognition.
    Leszczuk M; Kobosko M; Nawała J; Korus F; Grega M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screen Content Video Quality Assessment Model Using Hybrid Spatiotemporal Features.
    Zeng H; Huang H; Hou J; Cao J; Wang Y; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():6175-6187. PubMed ID: 36126028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blind Video Quality Assessment for Ultra-High-Definition Video Based on Super-Resolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Ying Z; Pan D; Shi P
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual straightening of natural videos.
    Hénaff OJ; Goris RLT; Simoncelli EP
    Nat Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 22(6):984-991. PubMed ID: 31036946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Video quality pooling adaptive to perceptual distortion severity.
    Park J; Seshadrinathan K; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Feb; 22(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 23008260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blind Stereoscopic Video Quality Assessment: From Depth Perception to Overall Experience.
    Zhibo Chen ; Wei Zhou ; Weiping Li
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Feb; 27(2):721-734. PubMed ID: 29185989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.