These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34856018)
1. Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes. Jones GM; Brosi B; Evans JM; Gottlieb IGW; Loy X; Núñez-Regueiro MM; Ober HK; Pienaar E; Pillay R; Pisarello K; Smith LL; Fletcher RJ Conserv Biol; 2022 Jun; 36(3):e13872. PubMed ID: 34856018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bat community response to intensification of biomass production for bioenergy across the southeastern United States. Ober HK; Jones GM; Gottlieb IGW; Johnson SA; Smith L; Brosi BJ; Fletcher RJ Ecol Appl; 2020 Oct; 30(7):e02155. PubMed ID: 32358982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests. Zitomer RA; Galbraith SM; Betts MG; Moldenke AR; Progar RA; Rivers JW Ecol Appl; 2023 Jul; 33(5):e2855. PubMed ID: 37040202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Invertebrate community response to coarse woody debris removal for bioenergy production from intensively managed forests. Grodsky SM; Moorman CE; Fritts SR; Campbell JW; Sorenson CE; Bertone MA; Castleberry SB; Wigley TB Ecol Appl; 2018 Jan; 28(1):135-148. PubMed ID: 28949046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to reconcile wood production and biodiversity conservation? The Pan-European boreal forest history gradient as an "experiment". Naumov V; Manton M; Elbakidze M; Rendenieks Z; Priednieks J; Uhlianets S; Yamelynets T; Zhivotov A; Angelstam P J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 218():1-13. PubMed ID: 29660541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of bioenergy on biodiversity arising from land-use change and crop type. Núñez-Regueiro MM; Siddiqui SF; Fletcher RJ Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 31854480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Projecting biodiversity and wood production in future forest landscapes: 15 key modeling considerations. Felton A; Ranius T; Roberge JM; Öhman K; Lämås T; Hynynen J; Juutinen A; Mönkkönen M; Nilsson U; Lundmark T; Nordin A J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():404-414. PubMed ID: 28411568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional diversity response to hardwood forest management varies across taxa and spatial scales. Murray BD; Holland JD; Summerville KS; Dunning JB; Saunders MR; Jenkins MA Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1064-1081. PubMed ID: 28295816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrasting taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity responses to forest modifications: comparisons of taxa and successive plant life stages in South African scarp forest. Grass I; Brandl R; Botzat A; Neuschulz EL; Farwig N PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118722. PubMed ID: 25719204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Conservation Value of Traditional Rural Landscapes: The Case of Woodpeckers in Transylvania, Romania. Dorresteijn I; Hartel T; Hanspach J; von Wehrden H; Fischer J PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65236. PubMed ID: 23840322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trade-offs between forest protection and wood supply in Europe. Verkerk PJ; Zanchi G; Lindner M Environ Manage; 2014 Jun; 53(6):1085-94. PubMed ID: 24699992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial mismatch between wild bee diversity hotspots and protected areas. Casanelles-Abella J; Fontana S; Meier E; Moretti M; Fournier B Conserv Biol; 2023 Aug; 37(4):e14082. PubMed ID: 36811162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conservation value of low-productivity forests measured as the amount and diversity of dead wood and saproxylic beetles. Hämäläinen A; Strengbom J; Ranius T Ecol Appl; 2018 Jun; 28(4):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 29446863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linking national wood consumption with global biodiversity and ecosystem service losses. Chaudhary A; Carrasco LR; Kastner T Sci Total Environ; 2017 May; 586():985-994. PubMed ID: 28222925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Land-use type and intensity differentially filter traits in above- and below-ground arthropod communities. Birkhofer K; Gossner MM; Diekötter T; Drees C; Ferlian O; Maraun M; Scheu S; Weisser WW; Wolters V; Wurst S; Zaitsev AS; Smith HG J Anim Ecol; 2017 May; 86(3):511-520. PubMed ID: 28118484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alpha and beta diversity of plants and animals along a tropical land-use gradient. Kessler M; Abrahamczyk S; Bos M; Buchori D; Putra DD; Gradstein SR; Höhn P; Kluge J; Orend F; Pitopang R; Saleh S; Schulze CH; Sporn SG; Steffan-Dewenter I; Tjitrosoedirdjo SS; Tscharntke T Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):2142-56. PubMed ID: 20014584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservation and production responses vary by disturbance intensity in a long-term forest management experiment. Kroll AJ; Springford A; Verschuyl J Ecol Appl; 2020 Oct; 30(7):e02148. PubMed ID: 32339366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of multispecies occupancy models to evaluate the response of bird communities to forest degradation associated with logging. Carrillo-Rubio E; Kéry M; Morreale SJ; Sullivan PJ; Gardner B; Cooch EG; Lassoie JP Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):1034-44. PubMed ID: 24628427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]