136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34856532)
21. Multidimensional same--different judgments: evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions.
Miller J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Aug; 4(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 681890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Limitations in advance task preparation: switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons.
Meiran N; Marciano H
Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):540-50. PubMed ID: 12184555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contextual effects in difference judgments.
Schifferstein HN
Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 7885808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Attentional distribution in the visual field during same-different judgments as assessed by response competition.
Pan K; Eriksen CW
Percept Psychophys; 1993 Feb; 53(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 8433911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Subjective judgments of speech clarity measured by paired comparisons and category rating.
Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Gornbein JA
Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 9288475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A task-irrelevant stimulus attribute affects perception and short-term memory.
Huang J; Kahana MJ; Sekuler R
Mem Cognit; 2009 Dec; 37(8):1088-102. PubMed ID: 19933454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Probing Proctor's priming principle: the effect of simultaneous and sequential presentation on same-different judgments.
Krueger LE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Jul; 9(3):511-23. PubMed ID: 6225832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the speed of intuition: intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines.
Bolte A; Goschke T
Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1248-55. PubMed ID: 16532857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Decelerative changes in heart rate during recognition of visual stimuli: effects of psychological stress.
De Pascalis V; Barry RJ; Sparita A
Int J Psychophysiol; 1995 Jun; 20(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 8543481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of concurrent cognitive load on phonological processing in adults who stutter.
Jones RM; Fox RA; Jacewicz E
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1862-75. PubMed ID: 22562825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Crossmodal exogenous orienting improves the accuracy of temporal order judgments.
Santangelo V; Spence C
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Apr; 194(4):577-86. PubMed ID: 19242685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Somatosensory prior entry assessed with temporal order judgments and simultaneity judgments.
Yates MJ; Nicholls ME
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1586-603. PubMed ID: 21487928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Judgments during perceptual comparisons predict distinct forms of memory updating.
Saito JM; Bae GY; Fukuda K
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jan; 153(1):38-55. PubMed ID: 37650822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments.
Davelaar EJ; Tian X; Weidemann CT; Huber DE
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):608-26. PubMed ID: 21904936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intersensory conflict between vision and touch: the response modality dominates when precise, attention-riveting judgments are required.
Heller MA; Calcaterra JA; Green SL; Brown L
Percept Psychophys; 1999 Oct; 61(7):1384-98. PubMed ID: 10572466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments.
Petzold P; Haubensak G
Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):969-78. PubMed ID: 11578058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Judging the difficulty of perceptual decisions.
Löffler A; Zylberberg A; Shadlen MN; Wolpert DM
bioRxiv; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 36824715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Attentional bias toward low-intensity stimuli: an explanation for the intensity dissociation between reaction time and temporal order judgment?
Jaśkowski P; Verleger R
Conscious Cogn; 2000 Sep; 9(3):435-56. PubMed ID: 10993668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.
Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
