These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34857050)

  • 1. Methodological quality and reporting standards in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of physical activity studies: a report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative).
    Oliveira NL; Botton CE; De Nardi AT; Umpierre D
    Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 10(1):304. PubMed ID: 34857050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meningioma systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an assessment of reporting and methodological quality.
    George AM; Gupta S; Keshwara SM; Mustafa MA; Gillespie CS; Richardson GE; Steele AC; Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH; Dirven L; Marson AG; Islim AI; Jenkinson MD; Millward CP
    Br J Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 36(6):678-685. PubMed ID: 36263847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are systematic reviews addressing nutrition for cancer prevention trustworthy? A systematic survey of quality and risk of bias.
    Zajac JF; Storman D; Swierz MJ; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    Nutr Rev; 2022 May; 80(6):1558-1567. PubMed ID: 34921318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Need for Training in Research Methodology Prior to Conducting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and the Effectiveness of an Online Training Program: The Global Andrology Forum Model.
    Cannarella R; Shah R; Boitrelle F; Saleh R; Durairajanayagam D; Harraz AM; Agarwal A
    World J Mens Health; 2023 Apr; 41(2):342-353. PubMed ID: 36593714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
    Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
    Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
    Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review.
    Downie LE; Makrai E; Bonggotgetsakul Y; Dirito LJ; Kristo K; Pham MN; You M; Verspoor K; Pianta MJ
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 136(9):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 29978192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inadequate diversity of information resources searched in US-affiliated systematic reviews and meta-analyses: 2005-2016.
    Pradhan R; Garnick K; Barkondaj B; Jordan HS; Ash A; Yu H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():50-62. PubMed ID: 29879464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
    Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
    Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of abstract of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry journals.
    Pulikkotil SJ; Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2019 Oct; 20(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 30887462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?
    O'Kelly F; DeCotiis K; Aditya I; Braga LH; Koyle MA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Apr; 16(2):207-217. PubMed ID: 31917158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention.
    Storman D; Koperny M; Zając J; Polak M; Weglarz P; Bochenek-Cibor J; Swierz MJ; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach AA; Kaluzinska K; Bała MM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological issues of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of sleep medicine: A meta-epidemiological study.
    Xu C; Furuya-Kanamori L; Kwong JSW; Li S; Liu Y; Doi SA
    Sleep Med Rev; 2021 Jun; 57():101434. PubMed ID: 33588267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Caffeine for the Treatment of Apnea in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Overview of Meta-Analyses.
    Alhersh E; Abushanab D; Al-Shaibi S; Al-Badriyeh D
    Paediatr Drugs; 2020 Aug; 22(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 32488731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.