201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34857429)
21. Machine Learning-Based Overall Survival Prediction of Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma From Multicentre Real-Life Data.
Bao L; Wang YT; Zhuang JL; Liu AJ; Dong YJ; Chu B; Chen XH; Lu MQ; Shi L; Gao S; Fang LJ; Xiang QQ; Ding YH
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():922039. PubMed ID: 35865475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of lung papillary adenocarcinoma-specific survival using ensemble machine learning models.
Xia K; Chen D; Jin S; Yi X; Luo L
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14827. PubMed ID: 37684259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Deep Learning Predicts the Malignant-Transformation-Free Survival of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders.
Adeoye J; Koohi-Moghadam M; Lo AWI; Tsang RK; Chow VLY; Zheng LW; Choi SW; Thomson P; Su YX
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(23):. PubMed ID: 34885164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of deep learning-based recurrence-free survival with random survival forest and Cox proportional hazard models in Stage-I NSCLC patients.
Kar İ; Kocaman G; İbrahimov F; Enön S; Coşgun E; Elhan AH
Cancer Med; 2023 Sep; 12(18):19272-19278. PubMed ID: 37644818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting overall survival in chordoma patients using machine learning models: a web-app application.
Cheng P; Xie X; Knoedler S; Mi B; Liu G
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 18(1):652. PubMed ID: 37660044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Explainable deep learning-based survival prediction for non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy.
Astley JR; Reilly JM; Robinson S; Wild JM; Hatton MQ; Tahir BA
Radiother Oncol; 2024 Apr; 193():110084. PubMed ID: 38244779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Machine learning methods for accurately predicting survival and guiding treatment in stage I and II hepatocellular carcinoma.
Li X; Bao H; Shi Y; Zhu W; Peng Z; Yan L; Chen J; Shu X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Nov; 102(45):e35892. PubMed ID: 37960763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Machine learning-based prediction of adverse events following an acute coronary syndrome (PRAISE): a modelling study of pooled datasets.
D'Ascenzo F; De Filippo O; Gallone G; Mittone G; Deriu MA; Iannaccone M; Ariza-Solé A; Liebetrau C; Manzano-Fernández S; Quadri G; Kinnaird T; Campo G; Simao Henriques JP; Hughes JM; Dominguez-Rodriguez A; Aldinucci M; Morbiducci U; Patti G; Raposeiras-Roubin S; Abu-Assi E; De Ferrari GM;
Lancet; 2021 Jan; 397(10270):199-207. PubMed ID: 33453782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Machine learning-based in-hospital mortality prediction models for patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Ke J; Chen Y; Wang X; Wu Z; Zhang Q; Lian Y; Chen F
Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Mar; 53():127-134. PubMed ID: 35033770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dementia risk prediction in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a comparison of Cox regression and machine learning models.
Wang M; Greenberg M; Forkert ND; Chekouo T; Afriyie G; Ismail Z; Smith EE; Sajobi TT
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):284. PubMed ID: 36324086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of machine learning models and Cox proportional hazards models regarding their ability to predict the risk of gastrointestinal cancer based on metabolic syndrome and its components.
Tran TT; Lee J; Gunathilake M; Kim J; Kim SY; Cho H; Kim J
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1049787. PubMed ID: 36937438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing machine learning approaches to incorporate time-varying covariates in predicting cancer survival time.
Cygu S; Seow H; Dushoff J; Bolker BM
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1370. PubMed ID: 36697455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interpretable Machine Learning for Choosing Radiation Dose-volume Constraints on Cardio-pulmonary Substructures Associated with Overall Survival in NRG Oncology RTOG 0617.
Lee SH; Geng H; Arnold J; Caruana R; Fan Y; Rosen MA; Apte AP; Deasy JO; Bradley JD; Xiao Y
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Dec; 117(5):1270-1286. PubMed ID: 37343707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative study of forest methods for time-to-event data: variable selection and predictive performance.
Liu Y; Zhou S; Wei H; An S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):193. PubMed ID: 34563138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.
Baralou V; Kalpourtzi N; Touloumi G
Biom J; 2023 Aug; 65(6):e2100380. PubMed ID: 36169048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment.
Herrin J; Abraham NS; Yao X; Noseworthy PA; Inselman J; Shah ND; Ngufor C
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e2110703. PubMed ID: 34019087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predicting Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Angina across the Spectrum of Dysglycemia: A Machine Learning Approach.
Li YH; Sheu WH; Yeh WC; Chang YC; Lee IT
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34207578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction and Risk Stratification of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetic Kidney Disease Patients.
Ren J; Liu D; Li G; Duan J; Dong J; Liu Z
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():923549. PubMed ID: 35811691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Machine learning versus traditional risk stratification methods in acute coronary syndrome: a pooled randomized clinical trial analysis.
Gibson WJ; Nafee T; Travis R; Yee M; Kerneis M; Ohman M; Gibson CM
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2020 Jan; 49(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 31535314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A LASSO-derived risk model for long-term mortality in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Li YM; Li ZL; Chen F; Liu Q; Peng Y; Chen M
J Transl Med; 2020 Apr; 18(1):157. PubMed ID: 32252780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
