These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34858096)

  • 21. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study.
    Beverley CA; Booth A; Bath PA
    Health Info Libr J; 2003 Jun; 20(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 12786905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medical librarians' knowledge and practices in locating clinical trials for systematic reviews.
    Westrick JC; Buchholz SW
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Apr; 109(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 34285672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A decade of systematic reviews: an assessment of Weill Cornell Medicine's systematic review service.
    Demetres MR; Wright DN; Hickner A; Jedlicka C; Delgado D
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2023 Jul; 111(3):728-732. PubMed ID: 37483367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Benchmarking veterinary librarians' participation in systematic reviews and scoping reviews.
    Toews L
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2019 Oct; 107(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 31607807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.
    McGowan J; Sampson M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2005 Jan; 93(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 15685278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey.
    Grossetta Nardini HK; Batten J; Funaro MC; Garcia-Milian R; Nyhan K; Spak JM; Wang L; Glover JG
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2019; 4():23. PubMed ID: 31798974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recording and accounting for stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews.
    Saan MC; Boeije HR; Sattoe JN; Bal MI; Missler M; van Wesel F
    Health Info Libr J; 2015 Jun; 32(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 25899465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examining the Reach and Impact of a Systematic Review Service.
    Healy HS; Regan M; Deberg J
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2020; 39(2):125-138. PubMed ID: 32329673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interprofessional collaboration between health sciences librarians and health professions faculty to implement a book club discussion for incoming students.
    Haley J; McCall RC; Zomorodi M; de Saxe Zerdan L; Moreton B; Richardson L
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2019 Jul; 107(3):403-410. PubMed ID: 31258446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Building the Systematic Review Core in an academic health sciences library.
    Lackey MJ; Greenberg H; Rethlefsen ML
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2019 Oct; 107(4):588-594. PubMed ID: 31607817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving data collection, documentation, and workflow in a dementia screening study.
    Read KB; LaPolla FW; Tolea MI; Galvin JE; Surkis A
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2017 Apr; 105(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 28377680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptions, experiences, and attitudes of health care professionals regarding the role of librarians in fostering evidence-based health practice: a systematic review protocol.
    Obasola OI; Kinengyere AA; Peter D; Chiweza D; Ross-White A; Godfrey C
    JBI Evid Synth; 2022 Jan; 20(1):181-188. PubMed ID: 34559697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing journal author guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: findings from an institutional sample.
    Goldberg J; Boyce LM; Soudant C; Godwin K
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Jan; 110(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 35210964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Developing a library systematic review service: a case study.
    Ludeman E; Downton K; Shipper AG; Fu Y
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2015; 34(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 25927509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks.
    Bullers K; Howard AM; Hanson A; Kearns WD; Orriola JJ; Polo RL; Sakmar KA
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Apr; 106(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 29632442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.
    Nguyen M; Pachana NA; Beattie E; Fielding E; Ramis MA
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Nov; 13(11):52-63. PubMed ID: 26657464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Participating in communities of practice.
    Bandy M; Condon J; Graves E
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2008; 27(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 19042723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Librarian contributions to clinical practice guidelines.
    Cruse P; Protzko S
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2014; 33(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 25023021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.