233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34859942)
21. The ability to screw-retain single implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT analysis.
Edmondson EK; Trejo PM; Soldatos N; Weltman RL
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 33610330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior implants associated with titanium and zirconia abutments and monotype zirconia implants.
Brandão de Holanda KA; Armini Caldas R; Amaral M; da Silva Concilio LR; Pino Vitti R
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Feb; 65(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 32938877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Finite element analysis of the angulation designment of implant planning in the anterior maxilla].
Han LH; Qiu XX; Xing XN; Cai LY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 25938143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Design and Biomechanical Analysis of Customized Angled Abutment Based on Tooth Inclination Angle for Immediate Implant Placement on Maxillary Anterior Region.
Chi CC; Shen YS; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Huang HL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-28. PubMed ID: 38728145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stress behavior of an anterior single implant restored with high-performance polymer abutments under immediate and delayed loading: A 3D FEA study.
Diken Turksayar AA; Donmez MB
J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 36007157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.
Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.
de Matos JDM; Lopes GDRS; Nakano LJN; Ramos NC; Vasconcelos JEL; Bottino MA; Tribst JPM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Feb; 25(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 34559574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A further finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla.
Wu D; Tian K; Chen J; Jin H; Huang W; Liu Y
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():560645. PubMed ID: 25802549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparative study between zirconia and titanium abutments on the stress distribution in parafunctional loading: A 3D finite element analysis.
Sivrikaya EC; Guler MS; Bekci ML
Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(6):603-613. PubMed ID: 32568140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative analysis of stress distribution around CFR‑PEEK implants and titanium implants with different prosthetic crowns: A finite element analysis.
Tamrakar SK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Rao S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):359-367. PubMed ID: 34597479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of Stress Generated with Different Abutment Materials and Angulations under Axial and Oblique Loading in the Anterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Kapoor S; Rodrigues S; Mahesh M; Shetty T; Pai U; Saldanha S; Hedge P; Shenoy S
Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():9205930. PubMed ID: 34899916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Angled abutments result in increased or decreased stress on surrounding bone of single-unit dental implants: a finite element analysis.
Tian K; Chen J; Han L; Yang J; Huang W; Wu D
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Dec; 34(10):1526-31. PubMed ID: 23122601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Different Surgical Techniques in the All-on-4 Treatment Concept: Evaluation of the Stress Distribution Created in Implant and Peripheral Bone with Finite Element Analysis.
Ciftci S; Ungor C; Suleymanli B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Dec; 38(6):1135-1144. PubMed ID: 38085744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
