176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34861175)
1. Welch-weighted Egger regression reduces false positives due to correlated pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization.
Brown BC; Knowles DA
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Dec; 108(12):2319-2335. PubMed ID: 34861175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics.
Morrison J; Knoblauch N; Marcus JH; Stephens M; He X
Nat Genet; 2020 Jul; 52(7):740-747. PubMed ID: 32451458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-trait transcriptome-wide association studies with probabilistic Mendelian randomization.
Liu L; Zeng P; Xue F; Yuan Z; Zhou X
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Feb; 108(2):240-256. PubMed ID: 33434493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploiting horizontal pleiotropy to search for causal pathways within a Mendelian randomization framework.
Cho Y; Haycock PC; Sanderson E; Gaunt TR; Zheng J; Morris AP; Davey Smith G; Hemani G
Nat Commun; 2020 Feb; 11(1):1010. PubMed ID: 32081875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies.
Yuan Z; Zhu H; Zeng P; Yang S; Sun S; Yang C; Liu J; Zhou X
Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3861. PubMed ID: 32737316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 May; 32(5):377-389. PubMed ID: 28527048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRCIP: a robust Mendelian randomization method accounting for correlated and idiosyncratic pleiotropy.
Xu S; Fung WK; Liu Z
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33704372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostics for Pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomization Studies: Global and Individual Tests for Direct Effects.
Dai JY; Peters U; Wang X; Kocarnik J; Chang-Claude J; Slattery ML; Chan A; Lemire M; Berndt SI; Casey G; Song M; Jenkins MA; Brenner H; Thrift AP; White E; Hsu L
Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 187(12):2672-2680. PubMed ID: 30188971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies.
Hemani G; Bowden J; Davey Smith G
Hum Mol Genet; 2018 Aug; 27(R2):R195-R208. PubMed ID: 29771313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets.
Minelli C; Del Greco M F; van der Plaat DA; Bowden J; Sheehan NA; Thompson J
Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 33899104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mendelian randomization incorporating uncertainty about pleiotropy.
Thompson JR; Minelli C; Bowden J; Del Greco FM; Gill D; Jones EM; Shapland CY; Sheehan NA
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4627-4645. PubMed ID: 28850703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression.
Bowden J; Spiller W; Del Greco M F; Sheehan N; Thompson J; Minelli C; Davey Smith G
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1264-1278. PubMed ID: 29961852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Constrained maximum likelihood-based Mendelian randomization robust to both correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects.
Xue H; Shen X; Pan W
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jul; 108(7):1251-1269. PubMed ID: 34214446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A data-driven approach for studying the role of body mass in multiple diseases: a phenome-wide registry-based case-control study in the UK Biobank.
Hyppönen E; Mulugeta A; Zhou A; Santhanakrishnan VK
Lancet Digit Health; 2019 Jul; 1(3):e116-e126. PubMed ID: 33323262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
