159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34861631)
21. Determining the number and size of background samples derived from an area adjacent to the target sample that provide the greatest support for a POI in a target sample.
Reither JB; Taylor D; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jan; 68():102977. PubMed ID: 38000160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Searching CODIS with binary conversions of STRmix interpretations.
Myers S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102569. PubMed ID: 34428671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Exploring likelihood ratios assigned for siblings of the true mixture contributor as an alternate contributor.
Kelly H; Coble M; Kruijver M; Wivell R; Bright JA
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1167-1175. PubMed ID: 35211970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Single-cell investigative genetics: Single-cell data produces genotype distributions concentrated at the true genotype across all mixture complexities.
Grgicak CM; Bhembe Q; Slooten K; Sheth NC; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103000. PubMed ID: 38199167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Carrying out common DNA donor analysis using DBLR™ on two or five-cell mini-mixture subsamples for improved discrimination power in complex DNA mixtures.
Huffman K; Kruijver M; Ballantyne J; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102908. PubMed ID: 37402330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio.
Lin MH; Bright JA; Pugh SN; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102175. PubMed ID: 31644964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.
Holland MM; Tiedge TM; Bender AJ; Gaston-Sanchez SA; McElhoe JA
Int J Legal Med; 2022 Mar; 136(2):433-446. PubMed ID: 35092470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Statistefix 4.0: A novel probabilistic software tool.
Schmidt M; Schiller R; Anslinger K; Wiegand P; Weirich V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102570. PubMed ID: 34474323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.
Schuerman C; Kalafut T; Buchanan C; Sutton J; Bright JA
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 32134501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cell Subsampling Recovers Probative DNA Profile Information from Unresolvable/Undetectable Minor Donors in Mixtures.
Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 35885899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Commentary on: Thompson WC. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: a case study comparing STRmix™ and TrueAllele™. J Forensic Sci. 2023;68 (3):1049-63. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15225.
Kalafut T; Curran JM; Coble MD; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):371-377. PubMed ID: 37877323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
