These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34862966)

  • 1. Improving trial generalizability using observational studies.
    Lee D; Yang S; Dong L; Wang X; Zeng D; Cai J
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1213-1225. PubMed ID: 34862966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Doubly robust estimators for generalizing treatment effects on survival outcomes from randomized controlled trials to a target population.
    Lee D; Yang S; Wang X
    J Causal Inference; 2022; 10(1):415-440. PubMed ID: 37637433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
    Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
    Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
    Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical inference for data-adaptive doubly robust estimators with survival outcomes.
    Díaz I
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2735-2748. PubMed ID: 30950107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An alternative empirical likelihood method in missing response problems and causal inference.
    Ren K; Drummond CA; Brewster PS; Haller ST; Tian J; Cooper CJ; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):5009-5028. PubMed ID: 27417265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Globally efficient non-parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting.
    Chan KC; Yam SC; Zhang Z
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2016 Jun; 78(3):673-700. PubMed ID: 27346982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the Population Average Treatment Effect in Observational Studies with Choice-Based Sampling.
    Zhang Z; Hu Z; Liu C
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Apr; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30990786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.
    Zivich PN; Breskin A
    Epidemiology; 2021 May; 32(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 33591058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doubly robust estimation and causal inference for recurrent event data.
    Su CL; Steele R; Shrier I
    Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(17):2324-2338. PubMed ID: 32346897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving efficiency of inference in clinical trials with external control data.
    Li X; Miao W; Lu F; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):394-403. PubMed ID: 34694626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Covariate selection with group lasso and doubly robust estimation of causal effects.
    Koch B; Vock DM; Wolfson J
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 28636276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating average treatment effects with a double-index propensity score.
    Cheng D; Chakrabortty A; Ananthakrishnan AN; Cai T
    Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):767-777. PubMed ID: 31797368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. genRCT: a statistical analysis framework for generalizing RCT findings to real-world population.
    Lee D; Yang S; Berry M; Stinchcombe T; Cohen HJ; Wang X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Apr; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 38590156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.