These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34864024)
1. Who is contributing where? Predicting ecosystem service multifunctionality for shellfish species through ecological principles. Rullens V; Townsend M; Lohrer AM; Stephenson F; Pilditch CA Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 808():152147. PubMed ID: 34864024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A conservation decision-making framework based on ecosystem service hotspot and interaction analyses on multiple scales. Hou Y; Li B; Müller F; Fu Q; Chen W Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 643():277-291. PubMed ID: 29940440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying ecological production functions for use in ecosystem services-based environmental risk assessment of chemicals. Faber JH; Marshall S; Brown AR; Holt A; van den Brink PJ; Maltby L Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 791():146409. PubMed ID: 33771395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages and challenges associated with implementing an ecosystem services approach to ecological risk assessment for chemicals. Maltby L; van den Brink PJ; Faber JH; Marshall S Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 621():1342-1351. PubMed ID: 29054617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mapping the functional connectivity of ecosystem services supply across a regional landscape. Field RD; Parrott L Elife; 2022 Feb; 11():. PubMed ID: 35175193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying key areas of ecosystem services potential to improve ecological management in Chongqing City, southwest China. Xiao Y; Xiao Q Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):258. PubMed ID: 29600440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inclusion of condition in natural capital assessments is critical to the implementation of marine nature-based solutions. Watson SCL; Watson GJ; Beaumont NJ; Preston J Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 2):156026. PubMed ID: 35595143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving ecosystem services supply provides insights for sustainable landscape planning: A case study in Beijing, China. Sun X; Yang P; Tao Y; Bian H Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149849. PubMed ID: 34455273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of spatial variability of multiple ecosystem services in grasslands of different intensities. Le Clec'h S; Finger R; Buchmann N; Gosal AS; Hörtnagl L; Huguenin-Elie O; Jeanneret P; Lüscher A; Schneider MK; Huber R J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 251():109372. PubMed ID: 31550606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping wild seafood potential, supply, flow and demand in Lithuania. Inácio M; Mikša K; Kalinauskas M; Pereira P Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 718():137356. PubMed ID: 32109814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining critical thresholds of ecological restoration based on ecosystem service index: A case study in the Pingjiang catchment in southern China. Wang C; Tang C; Fu B; Lü Y; Xiao S; Zhang J J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114220. PubMed ID: 34864589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Queiroz C; Meacham M; Richter K; Norström AV; Andersson E; Norberg J; Peterson G Ambio; 2015 Jan; 44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-101. PubMed ID: 25576284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Addressing disturbance risk to mountain forest ecosystem services. Stritih A; Bebi P; Rossi C; Grêt-Regamey A J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 296():113188. PubMed ID: 34225045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Country-scale mapping of ecosystem services provided by semi-natural grasslands. Villoslada Peciña M; Ward RD; Bunce RGH; Sepp K; Kuusemets V; Luuk O Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 661():212-225. PubMed ID: 30669054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar. Neugarten RA; Honzák M; Carret P; Koenig K; Andriamaro L; Cano CA; Grantham HS; Hole D; Juhn D; McKinnon M; Rasolohery A; Steininger M; Wright TM; Turner WR PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168575. PubMed ID: 28006005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Renard D; Rhemtulla JM; Bennett EM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(43):13411-6. PubMed ID: 26460005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of ecological models to assess the effects of a plant protection product on ecosystem services provided by an orchard. Van den Brink PJ; Alix A; Thorbek P; Baveco H; Agatz A; Faber JH; Brown AR; Marshall S; Maltby L Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 798():149329. PubMed ID: 34375230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Allocating and mapping ecosystem service demands with spatial flow from built-up areas to natural spaces. Shen J; Wang Y Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 798():149330. PubMed ID: 34340066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ecosystem service multifunctionality of Chinese fir plantations differing in stand age and implications for sustainable management. Zeng Y; Wu H; Ouyang S; Chen L; Fang X; Peng C; Liu S; Xiao W; Xiang W Sci Total Environ; 2021 Sep; 788():147791. PubMed ID: 34029826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using ecological production functions to link ecological processes to ecosystem services. Bruins RJ; Canfield TJ; Duke C; Kapustka L; Nahlik AM; Schäfer RB Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 27541951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]