124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34864484)
1. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model: Comparison of a team of assessors with different backgrounds and no prior experience of the Oxford Foot Model.
Reay J; Leboeuf F; Hanssen B; Chiu J; Jones R
Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():191-198. PubMed ID: 34864484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of relationship between foot arch, hindfoot, and hallux motion using Oxford foot model: Comparison between walking and running.
Shono H; Matsumoto Y; Kokubun T; Tsuruta A; Miyazawa T; Kobayashi A; Kanemura N
Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():96-102. PubMed ID: 34839207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults.
Wright CJ; Arnold BL; Coffey TG; Pidcoe PE
Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kinematic repeatability of a multi-segment foot model for dance.
Carter SL; Sato N; Hopper LS
Sports Biomech; 2018 Mar; 17(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28730921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; McCahill J; Stebbins J; Leardini A; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():126-132. PubMed ID: 32920448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different step lengths at a preferred walking speed on forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot motion in healthy young adults.
Lovekin EM; Buddhadev HH; Robey NJ; Chalmers GR
J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112117. PubMed ID: 38669796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-rater repeatability of the Oxford foot model in healthy children in different stages of the foot roll over process during gait.
Curtis DJ; Bencke J; Stebbins JA; Stansfield B
Gait Posture; 2009 Jul; 30(1):118-21. PubMed ID: 19356932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Piening M; Streekstra GJ; Maas M; van der Krogt MM; Harlaar J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 35668453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marker placement sensitivity of the Oxford and Rizzoli foot models in adults and children.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110629. PubMed ID: 34320419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model in children with foot deformity.
McCahill J; Stebbins J; Koning B; Harlaar J; Theologis T
Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():86-89. PubMed ID: 29310014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between the Rizzoli and Oxford foot models with independent and clustered tracking markers.
Teixeira BG; Araújo VL; Santos TRT; Magalhães FA; Resende RA; Schallig W; van der Krogt MM; Fonseca ST; Souza TR
Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():48-51. PubMed ID: 34649170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of the Oxford Foot Model to marker misplacement: A systematic single-case investigation.
Carty CP; Walsh HP; Gillett JG
Gait Posture; 2015 Sep; 42(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 26163347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot.
Hulshof CM; Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Streekstra GJ; Kleipool RP; Gg Dobbe J; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112001. PubMed ID: 38527409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sagittal plane kinematics of the foot during passive ankle dorsiflexion.
Gatt A; Chockalingam N; Chevalier TL
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 21975851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability testing of the heel marker in three-dimensional gait analysis.
McCahill J; Schallig W; Stebbins J; Prescott R; Theologis T; Harlaar J
Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():84-87. PubMed ID: 33517041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional analysis of foot motion after uphill walking with mobilization with movement using tape applied to the talocrural joint in women with limited ankle dorsiflexion.
Yoon JY; Oh JS; An DH
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Nov; 35(11):1217-25. PubMed ID: 25097190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five different multi-segment foot models.
Yoo HJ; Park HS; Lee DO; Kim SH; Park GY; Cho TJ; Lee DY
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 34991669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach.
Dixon PC; Böhm H; Döderlein L
J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 22304842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of multi-segmental kinematic modelling in the paediatric foot using three concurrent foot models.
Mahaffey R; Morrison SC; Drechsler WI; Cramp MC
J Foot Ankle Res; 2013 Oct; 6(1):43. PubMed ID: 24176241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of a multi-segment foot model in a neutral cushioning shoe during treadmill walking.
Balsdon MER; Dombroski CE
J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():60. PubMed ID: 30473733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
