These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34864484)
1. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model: Comparison of a team of assessors with different backgrounds and no prior experience of the Oxford Foot Model. Reay J; Leboeuf F; Hanssen B; Chiu J; Jones R Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():191-198. PubMed ID: 34864484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of relationship between foot arch, hindfoot, and hallux motion using Oxford foot model: Comparison between walking and running. Shono H; Matsumoto Y; Kokubun T; Tsuruta A; Miyazawa T; Kobayashi A; Kanemura N Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():96-102. PubMed ID: 34839207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults. Wright CJ; Arnold BL; Coffey TG; Pidcoe PE Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kinematic repeatability of a multi-segment foot model for dance. Carter SL; Sato N; Hopper LS Sports Biomech; 2018 Mar; 17(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28730921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults. Schallig W; van den Noort JC; McCahill J; Stebbins J; Leardini A; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():126-132. PubMed ID: 32920448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different step lengths at a preferred walking speed on forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot motion in healthy young adults. Lovekin EM; Buddhadev HH; Robey NJ; Chalmers GR J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112117. PubMed ID: 38669796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics. Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Piening M; Streekstra GJ; Maas M; van der Krogt MM; Harlaar J J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 35668453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-rater repeatability of the Oxford foot model in healthy children in different stages of the foot roll over process during gait. Curtis DJ; Bencke J; Stebbins JA; Stansfield B Gait Posture; 2009 Jul; 30(1):118-21. PubMed ID: 19356932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marker placement sensitivity of the Oxford and Rizzoli foot models in adults and children. Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110629. PubMed ID: 34320419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model in children with foot deformity. McCahill J; Stebbins J; Koning B; Harlaar J; Theologis T Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():86-89. PubMed ID: 29310014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between the Rizzoli and Oxford foot models with independent and clustered tracking markers. Teixeira BG; Araújo VL; Santos TRT; Magalhães FA; Resende RA; Schallig W; van der Krogt MM; Fonseca ST; Souza TR Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():48-51. PubMed ID: 34649170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of the Oxford Foot Model to marker misplacement: A systematic single-case investigation. Carty CP; Walsh HP; Gillett JG Gait Posture; 2015 Sep; 42(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 26163347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot. Hulshof CM; Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Streekstra GJ; Kleipool RP; Gg Dobbe J; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112001. PubMed ID: 38527409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sagittal plane kinematics of the foot during passive ankle dorsiflexion. Gatt A; Chockalingam N; Chevalier TL Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 21975851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional analysis of foot motion after uphill walking with mobilization with movement using tape applied to the talocrural joint in women with limited ankle dorsiflexion. Yoon JY; Oh JS; An DH Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Nov; 35(11):1217-25. PubMed ID: 25097190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five different multi-segment foot models. Yoo HJ; Park HS; Lee DO; Kim SH; Park GY; Cho TJ; Lee DY J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 34991669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multi-segment approach. Dixon PC; Böhm H; Döderlein L J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 22304842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of multi-segmental kinematic modelling in the paediatric foot using three concurrent foot models. Mahaffey R; Morrison SC; Drechsler WI; Cramp MC J Foot Ankle Res; 2013 Oct; 6(1):43. PubMed ID: 24176241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of a multi-segment foot model in a neutral cushioning shoe during treadmill walking. Balsdon MER; Dombroski CE J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():60. PubMed ID: 30473733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]