These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34864572)

  • 1. Adhesion of bioactive glass-based adhesive to bone.
    Sidhu VPS; Bilwani F; Towler MR; Papini M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105018. PubMed ID: 34864572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the interfacial work of fracture of glass-ionomer cements bonded to dentin.
    Cheetham JJ; Palamara JE; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jan; 29():427-37. PubMed ID: 24189324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of Adhesion of Sternal Wires to a Novel Bioactive Glass-Based Adhesive.
    Sidhu VPS; Towler MR; Papini M
    J Funct Biomater; 2019 Aug; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 31405006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The investigation of the testing method on fracture toughness of dental adhesive resins].
    Ai H; Zhao Y; Nagai M; Miyairi H; Yasuda N
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Oct; 18(5):298-300. PubMed ID: 12539644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.
    Francois P; Vennat E; Le Goff S; Ruscassier N; Attal JP; Dursun E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2599-2608. PubMed ID: 30317399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel adhesives for sternal fixation and stabilization: A biomechanical analysis.
    Mehrvar C; Kuzyk P; Cohen G; Safir O; Zalzal P; Alhalawani A; Towler MR; Papini M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():66-71. PubMed ID: 30703691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical property investigation of contemporary glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Moberg M; Brewster J; Nicholson J; Roberts H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1295-1308. PubMed ID: 29998443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo analysis of a proprietary glass-based adhesive for sternal fixation and stabilization using rabbit and sheep models.
    Mehrvar C; Deignan E; Hurtig M; Cohen G; Zalzal P; Safir O; Alhalawani A; Papini M; Towler MR
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2021 Apr; 32(5):53. PubMed ID: 33914176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporation of cellulose fiber in glass ionomer cement.
    Garoushi S; He J; Obradovic J; Fardim P; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2020 Feb; 128(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31994247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration.
    Hashem DF; Foxton R; Manoharan A; Watson TF; Banerjee A
    Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 24418628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interfacial fracture toughness between bovine cortical bone and cements.
    Lucksanasombool P; Higgs WA; Higgs RJ; Swain MV
    Biomaterials; 2003 Mar; 24(7):1159-66. PubMed ID: 12527256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of five dental adhesives using a fracture mechanics approach.
    Jancar J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Apr; 4(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 21316611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cement layer thickness on the adhesive bond strength of polyalkenoate cements.
    Akinmade AO; Hill RG
    Biomaterials; 1992; 13(13):931-6. PubMed ID: 1477262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Bond strengths of absorbable polylactic acid root canal post with three different adhesives].
    Pan H; Cheng C; Hu J; Liu H; Sun ZH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Dec; 47(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 26679663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin.
    Norevall LI; Marcusson A; Persson M
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Aug; 18(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 8921659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding to glass ionomer cements using resin-based adhesives.
    Zhang Y; Burrow MF; Palamara JE; Thomas CD
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 21864124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Glass ionomer cements as orthodontic bracket adhesives. An in vitro study with 4 glass ionomer cements (GIC) and 2 conventional orthodontic bracket adhesives as the comparative group].
    Jähnig A; Henkel S
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1990 Aug; 51(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 2227735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin.
    Burrow MF; Nopnakeepong U; Phrukkanon S
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 11823016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of bonding glass polyalkenoate cement to the surface of dental ceramic material.
    Vallittu PK; Forss H
    Int Dent J; 1997 Feb; 47(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 9448790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.