These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34865239)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of expert assessments of hand-wrist physical exposures.
    Mikkelsen S; Petersen R; Lund CB; Petersen JA; Thomsen JF
    Am J Ind Med; 2022 Feb; 65(2):132-142. PubMed ID: 34865239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity and reliability of a wearable-controlled serious game and goniometer for telemonitoring of wrist fracture rehabilitation.
    Meijer HAW; Graafland M; Obdeijn MC; Schijven MP; Goslings JC
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Apr; 48(2):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 33885912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone
    Pourahmadi MR; Ebrahimi Takamjani I; Sarrafzadeh J; Bahramian M; Mohseni-Bandpei MA; Rajabzadeh F; Taghipour M
    J Anat; 2017 Mar; 230(3):484-495. PubMed ID: 27910103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and Validity of Goniometer and Visual Assessments of Angular Joint Positions of the Hand and Wrist.
    McVeigh KH; Murray PM; Heckman MG; Rawal B; Peterson JJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 41(4):e21-35. PubMed ID: 26810826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of inertial sensors for elbow and wrist range of motion assessment.
    Costa V; Ramírez Ó; Otero A; Muñoz-García D; Uribarri S; Raya R
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9687. PubMed ID: 32864213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study.
    Carter TI; Pansy B; Wolff AL; Hillstrom HJ; Backus SI; Lenhoff M; Wolfe SW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1422-8. PubMed ID: 19703734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of wrist and forearm range of motion using the Dartfish motion analysis system.
    Kassay AD; Daher B; Lalone EA
    J Hand Ther; 2021; 34(4):604-611. PubMed ID: 33309432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual assessments of knee and wrist joint range motion have comparable reliability with face-to-face assessments.
    Mehta SP; Kendall KM; Reasor CM
    Musculoskeletal Care; 2021 Jun; 19(2):208-216. PubMed ID: 33107154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of an objective device for assessing circumductive wrist motion.
    Franko OI; Lal S; Pauyo T; Alexander M; Zurakowski D; Day C
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 33(8):1293-300. PubMed ID: 18929191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone Application for Measuring Wrist and Metacarpophalangeal Joint Motion.
    Özçelep ÖF; Yavuzer MG; Tunali AN
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58047. PubMed ID: 38738165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remote Assessment of Wrist Range of Motion: Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement of Provider Estimation and Direct Measurement With Photographs and Tracings.
    Scott KL; Skotak CM; Renfree KJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Nov; 44(11):954-965. PubMed ID: 31358397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the validity and reliability of three different methods used for wrist proprioception measurement.
    Seven B; Zorlular A; Oskay D
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2024 Jan; 37():170-176. PubMed ID: 38432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity assessment of the hand activity level threshold limit value and strain index using expert ratings of mono-task jobs.
    Spielholz P; Bao S; Howard N; Silverstein B; Fan J; Smith C; Salazar C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Apr; 5(4):250-7. PubMed ID: 18286422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wrist ROM measurements using smartphone photography: Reliability and validity.
    Ge M; Chen J; Zhu ZJ; Shi P; Yin LR; Xia L
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 39(4):261-264. PubMed ID: 32171926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal detectable difference of the finger and wrist range of motion: comparison of goniometry and 3D motion analysis.
    Reissner L; Fischer G; List R; Taylor WR; Giovanoli P; Calcagni M
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 14(1):173. PubMed ID: 31182129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity analyzes of Kinect V2 based measurement system for shoulder motions.
    Çubukçu B; Yüzgeç U; Zileli R; Zileli A
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Feb; 76():20-31. PubMed ID: 31882393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wrist motion assessment using Microsoft Azure Kinect DK: A reliability study in healthy individuals.
    Królikowska A; Maj A; Dejnek M; Prill R; Skotowska-Machaj A; Kołcz A
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2023 Feb; 32(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 36135819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion.
    Bedekar N; Suryawanshi M; Rairikar S; Sancheti P; Shyam A
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2014; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24029833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer in evaluation of wrist proprioception.
    Tekin F; Can-Akman T; Kitiş A
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2022 Apr; 41(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 34974162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goniometry and linear assessments to monitor movement outcomes: are they reliable tools in burn survivors?
    Edgar D; Finlay V; Wu A; Wood F
    Burns; 2009 Feb; 35(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 18950951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.