These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34865287)

  • 1. Online urological educational material for medical students: can search engines be trusted?
    Gunasegaram J; Ong S; Swann R; Lawrentschuk N
    BJU Int; 2022 Mar; 129(3):409-417. PubMed ID: 34865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Prostate Cancer.
    Chang DTS; Abouassaly R; Lawrentschuk N
    Adv Urol; 2018; 2018():6705152. PubMed ID: 30627152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Urolithiasis on the Google Search Engine.
    Chang DT; Abouassaly R; Lawrentschuk N
    Adv Urol; 2016; 2016():8243095. PubMed ID: 28044076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google output.
    Allam A; Schulz PJ; Nakamoto K
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Apr; 16(4):e100. PubMed ID: 24694866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of information regarding abnormal uterine bleeding available online.
    Werneck RA; Meinberg MF; Passos MZ; Brandão WC; de Moraes EN; da Silva-Filho AL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Mar; 282():83-88. PubMed ID: 36689893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
    Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multilingual evaluation of current health information on the Internet for the treatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
    Chen EC; Manecksha RP; Abouassaly R; Bolton DM; Reich O; Lawrentschuk N
    Prostate Int; 2014 Dec; 2(4):161-8. PubMed ID: 25599071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Online Information on Electronic Cigarettes: Comparative Study of Relevant Websites From Baidu and Google Search Engines.
    Chen T; Gentry S; Qiu D; Deng Y; Notley C; Cheng G; Song F
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jan; 22(1):e14725. PubMed ID: 32012069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arthroplasty information on the internet: quality or quantity?
    Davaris MT; Dowsey MM; Bunzli S; Choong PF
    Bone Jt Open; 2020 Apr; 1(4):64-73. PubMed ID: 33215109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
    Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients : The Internet as an information source.
    Janssen S; Käsmann L; Fahlbusch FB; Rades D; Vordermark D
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Feb; 194(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 28856383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality Evaluation of Consumer Health Information Websites Found on Google Using DISCERN, CRAAP, and HONcode.
    Portillo IA; Johnson CV; Johnson SY
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2021; 40(4):396-407. PubMed ID: 34752199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female urinary incontinence health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.
    Saraswat I; Abouassaly R; Dwyer P; Bolton DM; Lawrentschuk N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 26353845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality and reliability of the Internet as a source of information for hypodontia patients.
    Goodrum E; Johal A
    J Orthod; 2023 Sep; 50(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 36628988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.
    Lloyd MS; Lafferty K; Horton J; Noons P; Dover S; Evans M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):874-5. PubMed ID: 27192636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet.
    Bruce-Brand RA; Baker JF; Byrne DP; Hogan NA; McCarthy T
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1095-100. PubMed ID: 23582738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A decade devoted to improving online health information quality.
    Boyer C; Geissbuhler A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 116():891-6. PubMed ID: 16160371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.