These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34865590)

  • 1. Bipolar versus quadripolar left ventricular leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: evidence to date.
    Fyenbo DB; Park Frausing MHJ; Kronborg MB
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Dec; 19(12):1075-1084. PubMed ID: 34865590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical outcomes after implantation of quadripolar compared to bipolar left ventricular leads in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Erath JW; Benz AP; Hohnloser SH; Vamos M
    Europace; 2019 Oct; 21(10):1543-1549. PubMed ID: 31324920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy in a Large, Multicenter UK Registry.
    Behar JM; Chin HM; Fearn S; Ormerod JO; Gamble J; Foley PW; Bostock J; Claridge S; Jackson T; Sohal M; Antoniadis AP; Razavi R; Betts TR; Herring N; Rinaldi CA
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Feb; 3(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 28280785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
    Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
    Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of implantation of quadripolar left ventricular leads on CRT response.
    Erath JW; Vamos M; Domokos D; Benz AP; Bari Z; Bogyi P; Duray GZ; Hohnloser SH
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Jun; 55(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 31025153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.
    Forleo GB; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Molfetta AD; Santini L; Romeo F
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20887804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quadripolar versus bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: An analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
    Hakemi EU; Doukky R; Parzynski CS; Curtis JP; Madias C
    Heart Rhythm; 2020 Jan; 17(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 31369870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance and clinical comparison between left ventricular quadripolar and bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Observational research.
    Ziacchi M; Zucchelli G; Ricciardi D; Morani G; De Ruvo E; Calzolari V; Viani S; Calabrese V; Tomasi L; Calò L; De Mattia L; Bongiorni MG; Boriani G; Biffi M
    Indian Heart J; 2018; 70(6):864-871. PubMed ID: 30580858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.
    Forleo GB; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Mantica M; Parisi Q; Martino A; Pappalardo A; Sergi D; Tesauro M; Papavasileiou LP; Santini L; Calò L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25504267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective nonapical left ventricular pacing with quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Forleo GB; Schiavone M; Della Rocca D; Solimene F; Schillaci V; Covino G; Sassara M; Savarese G; Donzelli S; Badolati S; Gerosa C; Lavalle C; Gasperetti A; Mitacchione G; Lovecchio M; Valsecchi S; Santini L
    Kardiol Pol; 2021 Apr; 79(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 33750083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study.
    Crossley GH; Biffi M; Johnson B; Lin A; Gras D; Hussin A; Cuffio A; Collier JL; El-Chami M; Li S; Holloman K; Exner DV
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Apr; 12(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 25533587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of quadripolar LV leads on heart failure hospitalization rates among patients implanted with CRT-D: data from the Israeli ICD Registry.
    Leshem E; Suleiman M; Laish-Farkash A; Haim M; Geist M; Luria D; Glikson M; Goldenberg I; Michowitz Y;
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 29274032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute and mid-term outcomes of transvenous implant of a new left ventricular quadripolar lead versus bipolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from a single-center prospective database.
    Arias MA; Pachón M; Puchol A; Jiménez-López J; Rodríguez-Padial L
    Cardiol J; 2012; 19(5):470-8. PubMed ID: 23042310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acute and long-term outcomes of quadripolar IS-4 versus bipolar IS-1 left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A retrospective registry study.
    Maurhofer J; Asatryan B; Haeberlin A; Noti F; Roten L; Seiler J; Baldinger SH; Franzeck F; Lam A; Kueffer T; Reichlin T; Tanner H; Servatius H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 May; 46(5):365-375. PubMed ID: 36912446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of quadripolar left ventricular leads improves the hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Osca J; Alonso P; Cano Ó; Sánchez JM; Tejada D; Andrés A; Sancho Tello MJ; Olagüe J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 25492127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term follow-up of patients with a quadripolar active fixation left ventricular lead: An Italian multicenter experience.
    De Regibus V; Biffi M; Infusino T; Savastano S; Landolina M; Palmisano P; Foti R; Facchin D; Dello Russo A; Urraro F; Ziacchi M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1567-1575. PubMed ID: 35634866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
    Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Shetty AK; Duckett SG; Bostock J; Rosenthal E; Rinaldi CA
    Europace; 2011 Jul; 13(7):992-6. PubMed ID: 21343237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Vado A; Menardi E; Rossetti G; Ballari G; Feola M; Bobbio M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 39(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 24293178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.