238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34866026)
1. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
Hashemzadeh H; Soleimani M; Golbar M; Dehghani Soltani A; Mirmalek SP
Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains.
Barsoum HA; ElSayed HS; El Sharaby FA; Palomo JM; Mostafa YA
Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):441-448. PubMed ID: 34181721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
Bokas J; Woods M
Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
Mowafy MI; Zaher AR
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
da Costa Monini A; Júnior LGG; Vianna AP; Martins RP
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1047-1053. PubMed ID: 27246754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of elastic memory chains versus nickel-titanium coil springs in canine retraction: A two-center split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
Khanemasjedi M; Moradinejad M; Javidi P; Niknam O; Jahromi NH; Rakhshan V
Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):561-574. PubMed ID: 29153282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
Sueri MY; Turk T
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 17090165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orthodontic space closure in sliding mechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sebastian B; Bhuvaraghan A; Thiruvenkatachari B
Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):210-225. PubMed ID: 34609513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of maxillary canine retraction into healed and recent extraction sites using cone beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial.
Almaasarani SG; Rajeh N
Angle Orthod; 2023 Jul; 93(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 37017438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction:
da C Monini A; Gandini LG; Vianna AP; Martins RP; Jacob HB
Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30741577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the efficacy of two-time versus one-time micro-osteoperforation on maxillary canine retraction in orthodontic patients: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Jaiswal AA; Siddiqui HP; Samrit VD; Duggal R; Kharbanda OP; Rajeswari MR
Int Orthod; 2021 Sep; 19(3):415-424. PubMed ID: 34281788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hassan SE; Hajeer MY; Alali OH; Kaddah AS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 27484605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canine Retraction Using a Closed Nickel Titanium Coil Spring and an Elastic Module.
Khalid Z; Bangash AA; Anwar A; Pasha H; Amin E
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Sep; 28(9):695-698. PubMed ID: 30158036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of space closure rates between preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy T-loops: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Keng FY; Quick AN; Swain MV; Herbison P
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21415288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
