These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34866067)
1. Original vs compatible stock abutment- implant connection: An in vitro analysis of the internal accuracy and mechanical fatigue behaviour. Alonso-Pérez R; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Jul; 66(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 34866067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Original versus nonoriginal cast-to-gold abutment-implant connection: Analysis of the internal fit and long-term fatigue performance. Alonso-Pérez R; Bartolomé JF; Fraile C; Pradíes G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):94.e1-94.e9. PubMed ID: 34006366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging. Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface. Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Original vs. non-original abutments for screw-retained single implant crowns: An in vitro evaluation of internal fit, mechanical behaviour and screw loosening. Alonso-Pérez R; Bartolomé JF; Ferreiroa A; Salido MP; Pradíes G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1230-1238. PubMed ID: 30537302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical strength of stock and custom abutments as original and aftermarket components after thermomechanical aging. Pol CWP; Cune MS; Raghoebar GM; Naves LZ; Meijer HJA Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Aug; 10(4):e892. PubMed ID: 39052871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs. Sen N; Us YO J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 31326150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments. Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study. Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of abutment finish lines on the mechanical behavior and marginal fit of screw-retained implant crowns: An in vitro study. García-González M; González-González I; García-García I; Blasón-González S; Lamela-Rey MJ; Fernández-Canteli A; Álvarez-Arenal Á J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):318.e1-318.e10. PubMed ID: 34657727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections. Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental implant-abutment fracture resistance and wear induced by single-unit screw-retained CAD components fabricated by four CAM methods after mechanical cycling. Markarian RA; Galles DP; França FMG J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 33640089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading. Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants. Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants. Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation. Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A pilot study of joint stability at the zirconium or titanium abutment/titanium implant interface. Cavusoglu Y; Akça K; Gürbüz R; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 24683559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fatigue fracture resistance of titanium and chairside CAD-CAM zirconia implant abutments supporting zirconia crowns: An in vitro comparative and finite element analysis study. Giner S; Bartolomé JF; Gomez-Cogolludo P; Castellote C; Pradíes G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):503.e1-503.e9. PubMed ID: 33243472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]