These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34866250)

  • 1. Professional and patient-reported outcomes of two surgical approaches for implant-supported single-crown restoration: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Nielsen HB; Schou S; Bruun NH; Starch-Jensen T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Feb; 33(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 34866250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements performed by dental students: a retrospective evaluation 8 to 12 years after treatment.
    Bonde MJ; Stokholm R; Schou S; Isidor F
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 24570983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.
    Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 25237669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient satisfaction and esthetic outcome after immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment.
    Hartlev J; Kohberg P; Ahlmann S; Andersen NT; Schou S; Isidor F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1245-1250. PubMed ID: 24024479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Schincaglia GP; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 25418606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Feasibility analysis of visual analogue scale in esthetic evaluation of anterior implant-supported single crown in maxilla].
    Yang JW; Jia PY; Qiu LX; Lu C; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 56(4):324-328. PubMed ID: 33832032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Nielsen HB; Schou S; Bruun NH; Starch-Jensen T
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jul; 7(1):66. PubMed ID: 34268630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esthetic outcomes with porcelain-fused-to-ceramic and all-ceramic single-implant crowns: a randomized clinical trial.
    Gallucci GO; Grütter L; Nedir R; Bischof M; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jan; 22(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 21158931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of Straumann(®) Standard Plus implants supported single crowns placed in non-augmented healed sites in the anterior maxilla: a 5-8 years retrospective study.
    Zhao X; Qiao SC; Shi JY; Uemura N; Arai K; Lai HC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jan; 27(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 25534135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants:A 5-year randomised controlled trial.
    Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):315-326. PubMed ID: 31535100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome.
    den Hartog L; Raghoebar GM; Slater JJ; Stellingsma K; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 21815991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-Year data.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CHF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Dec; 45(12):1465-1474. PubMed ID: 30341961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and aesthetic outcomes of immediately placed single-tooth implants with immediate vs. delayed restoration in the anterior maxilla: A retrospective cohort study.
    Arora H; Ivanovski S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):346-352. PubMed ID: 29453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Jacotti M; Grandi G; Tuco L; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 26669545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy evaluation of partially guided and fully guided templates applied to implant surgery of anterior teeth: A randomized controlled trial.
    Lou F; Rao P; Zhang M; Luo S; Lu S; Xiao J
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Feb; 23(1):117-130. PubMed ID: 33528110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the influence exerted by different dental specialty backgrounds and measuring instrument reproducibility on esthetic aspects of maxillary implant-supported single crown.
    Vaidya S; Ho YL; Hao J; Lang NP; Mattheos N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 25496129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores.
    Belser UC; Grütter L; Vailati F; Bornstein MM; Weber HP; Buser D
    J Periodontol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 19228100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics.
    Cosyn J; Eghbali A; De Bruyn H; Collys K; Cleymaet R; De Rouck T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 21752044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of the Straumann Bone Level Implant system for anterior single-tooth replacements in augmented and nonaugmented sites: a prospective cohort study with 60 consecutive patients.
    Santing HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; den Hartog L; Meijer HJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):941-8. PubMed ID: 22540833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study.
    Perelli M; Abundo R; Corrente G; Saccone C
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 23000710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.