These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34866708)

  • 1. Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.
    Pohl S; Schulze D; Stets E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 45(7-8):477-493. PubMed ID: 34866708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items.
    Chen Y; Li C; Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1097-1122. PubMed ID: 37550561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning.
    Belzak WCM; Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):673-690. PubMed ID: 31916799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anchor Selection Strategies for DIF Analysis: Review, Assessment, and New Approaches.
    Kopf J; Zeileis A; Strobl C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):22-56. PubMed ID: 29795811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DIF Analysis with Unknown Groups and Anchor Items.
    Wallin G; Chen Y; Moustaki I
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; 89(1):267-295. PubMed ID: 38383880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory.
    Meade AW; Wright NA
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Sep; 97(5):1016-31. PubMed ID: 22468848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential Item Functioning Analysis Without A Priori Information on Anchor Items: QQ Plots and Graphical Test.
    Yuan KH; Liu H; Han Y
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):345-377. PubMed ID: 33656627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Framework for Anchor Methods and an Iterative Forward Approach for DIF Detection.
    Kopf J; Zeileis A; Strobl C
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Mar; 39(2):83-103. PubMed ID: 29880995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wald χ
    Huang S; Valdivia DS
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Jun; 84(3):530-548. PubMed ID: 38756461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress.
    Teresi JA; Ocepek-Welikson K; Kleinman M; Cook KF; Crane PK; Gibbons LE; Morales LS; Orlando-Edelen M; Cella D
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():43-68. PubMed ID: 17484039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of sources of DIF using covariates in patient-reported outcome measures: a simulation study comparing two approaches based on Rasch family models.
    Dubuy Y; Hardouin JB; Blanchin M; Sébille V
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1191107. PubMed ID: 37637889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Monte Carlo Study of an Iterative Wald Test Procedure for DIF Analysis.
    Cao M; Tay L; Liu Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 77(1):104-118. PubMed ID: 29795905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale across 11 world-wide societies.
    Stevanovic D; Bagheri Z; Atilola O; Vostanis P; Stupar D; Moreira P; Franic T; Davidovic N; Knez R; Nikšić A; Dodig-Ćurković K; Avicenna M; Multazam Noor I; Nussbaum L; Deljkovic A; Aziz Thabet A; Petrov P; Ubalde D; Monteiro LA; Ribas R
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(4):430-440. PubMed ID: 27353487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Multiple-Group Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Ma W; Terzi R; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jan; 45(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 33304020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using restricted factor analysis to select anchor items and detect differential item functioning.
    Kolbe L; Jorgensen TD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):138-151. PubMed ID: 30402814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
    Teresi JA; Ocepek-Welikson K; Kleinman M; Ramirez M; Kim G
    Psychol Test Assess Model; 2016; 58(1):183-219. PubMed ID: 28649483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
    Teresi JA; Ocepek-Welikson K; Cook KF; Kleinman M; Ramirez M; Reid MC; Siu A
    Psychol Test Assess Model; 2016; 58(2):309-352. PubMed ID: 28983449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric Properties and Performance of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
    Teresi JA; Ocepek-Welikson K; Kleinman M; Ramirez M; Kim G
    Psychol Test Assess Model; 2016; 58(1):141-181. PubMed ID: 28553573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating Measurement Invariance in Computer-Based Personality Testing: The Impact of Using Anchor Items on Effect Size Indices.
    Egberink IJL; Meijer RR; Tendeiro JN
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):126-145. PubMed ID: 29795815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian penalty methods for evaluating measurement invariance in moderated nonlinear factor analysis.
    Brandt H; Chen SM; Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37289539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.