These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34867107)

  • 21. Volumetric assessment of lesion severity with optical coherence tomography: relationship with fractional flow.
    Guagliumi G; Sirbu V; Petroff C; Capodanno D; Musumeci G; Yamamoto H; Elbasiony A; Brushett C; Matiashvili A; Lortkipanidze N; Valsecchi O; Bezerra HG; Schmitt JM
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Feb; 8(10):1172-81. PubMed ID: 23425542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography parameters in predicting in-stent hemodynamic severe coronary lesions: validation against fractional flow reserve.
    Belkacemi A; Stella PR; Ali DS; Novianti PW; Doevendans PA; van Belle E; Agostoni P
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(4):4209-13. PubMed ID: 23953267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve.
    Lopes JP; Jordan MK; Bezerra H; Costa MA; Attizzani G
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2017 Jun; 65(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 27958692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relationship between optical coherence tomography derived intraluminal and intramural criteria and haemodynamic relevance as determined by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses of patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Reith S; Battermann S; Jaskolka A; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R; Marx N; Burgmaier M
    Heart; 2013 May; 99(10):700-7. PubMed ID: 23543283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Functional Stenosis Assessment: FUSION-A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Jeremias A; Maehara A; Matsumura M; Shlofmitz RA; Maksoud A; Akasaka T; Bezerra HG; Fearon WF; Samady H; Samuels B; Rapkin J; Gopinath A; Teraphongphom NT; Buccola J; Ali ZA
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Apr; 17(4):e013702. PubMed ID: 38525609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Utilization of frequency domain optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve to assess intermediate coronary artery stenoses: conciliating anatomic and physiologic information.
    Stefano GT; Bezerra HG; Attizzani G; Chamié D; Mehanna E; Yamamoto H; Costa MA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Feb; 27(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 21409535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography: a comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound.
    Gonzalo N; Escaned J; Alfonso F; Nolte C; Rodriguez V; Jimenez-Quevedo P; Bañuelos C; Fernández-Ortiz A; Garcia E; Hernandez-Antolin R; Macaya C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 59(12):1080-9. PubMed ID: 22421301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lumen boundaries extracted from coronary computed tomography angiography on computed fractional flow reserve (FFRCT): validation with optical coherence tomography.
    Uzu K; Otake H; Choi G; Toba T; Kim HJ; Roy A; Schaap M; Grady L; Kawata M; Shinke T; Taylor CA; Hirata KI
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Feb; 14(15):e1609-e1618. PubMed ID: 29616627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optical coherence tomography-defined plaque vulnerability in relation to functional stenosis severity stratified by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio.
    Kanno Y; Sugiyama T; Hoshino M; Usui E; Hamaya R; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Lee T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 96(3):E238-E247. PubMed ID: 32012438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Pyxaras SA; Tu S; Barbato E; Barbati G; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Mangiacapra F; Sinagra G; De Bruyne B; Reiber JH; Wijns W
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1010-1018.e1. PubMed ID: 24268215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?
    Rossi A; Papadopoulou SL; Pugliese F; Russo B; Dharampal AS; Dedic A; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Meijboom WB; van Geuns RJ; Wragg A; Ligthart J; Schultz C; Petersen SE; Nieman K; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24280729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-Derived Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Seike F; Uetani T; Nishimura K; Kawakami H; Higashi H; Aono J; Nagai T; Inoue K; Suzuki J; Kawakami H; Okura T; Yasuda K; Higaki J; Ikeda S
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 120(10):1772-1779. PubMed ID: 28864324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Angiography-derived functional assessment of left main coronary stenoses.
    Yuasa S; Lauri FM; Mejia-Renteria H; Liontou C; Lee HJ; Tanigaki T; Nakayama M; Warisawa T; Uchiyama T; Matsuo H; Davies JE; Sato T; Escaned J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 May; 101(6):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 36934387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative assessment of atherosclerosis of rabbit femoral artery by Duplex Ultrasound Scanning, Optical Coherence Tomography and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Yang JM; Yao JT; Zhang JY; Wang Y; Sun X; Wang KK; Tian Y
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(6):1533-1538. PubMed ID: 30574761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity.
    Kang SJ; Lee JY; Ahn JM; Mintz GS; Kim WJ; Park DW; Yun SC; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Feb; 4(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 21266708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Better Diagnosis of Functionally Significant Intermediate Sized Narrowings Using Intravascular Ultrasound-Minimal Lumen Area and Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Myocardial Segmentation.
    Kang SJ; Yang DH; Kweon J; Kim YH; Lee JG; Jung J; Kim N; Mintz GS; Kang JW; Lim TH; Park SW
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 117(8):1282-8. PubMed ID: 26892449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationship of the Duke jeopardy score combined with minimal lumen diameter as assessed by computed tomography angiography to the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenosis.
    Yu M; Zhao Y; Li W; Lu Z; Wei M; Zhou W; Zhang J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(3):247-254. PubMed ID: 29598929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR?
    Solecki M; Kruk M; Demkow M; Schoepf UJ; Reynolds MA; Wardziak Ł; Dzielińska Z; Śpiewak M; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Małek Ł; Marczak M; Kępka C
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 28844869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve--meta-analysis: pooled accuracy of IVUS luminal area versus FFR.
    Nascimento BR; de Sousa MR; Koo BK; Samady H; Bezerra HG; Ribeiro AL; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Sep; 84(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 23737441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Functional Severity Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Myocardial Mass at Risk and Minimal Lumen Diameter.
    Sadamatsu K; Nagaoka K; Koga Y; Kagiyama K; Muramatsu K; Hironaga K; Tashiro H; Ueno T; Fukumoto Y
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2020; 2020():6716130. PubMed ID: 32082419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.