These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34868538)

  • 1. Bimanual Grasping Adheres to Weber's Law.
    Hesse C; Harrison RE; Giesel M; Schenk T
    Iperception; 2021 Nov; 12(6):20416695211054534. PubMed ID: 34868538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law.
    Ganel T; Namdar G; Mirsky A
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6467. PubMed ID: 28743925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():32-41. PubMed ID: 24556320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Violations of Weber's law tell us more about methodological challenges in sensorimotor research than about the neural correlates of visual behaviour.
    Schenk T; Utz KS; Hesse C
    Vision Res; 2017 Nov; 140():140-143. PubMed ID: 28965858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not only perception but also grasping actions can obey Weber's law.
    Derzsi Z; Volcic R
    Cognition; 2023 Aug; 237():105465. PubMed ID: 37150154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic grasping escapes Weber's law.
    Löwenkamp C; Gärtner W; Haus ID; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():235-45. PubMed ID: 25731904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hand anthropometry and the limits of aperture separation determine the utility of Weber's law in grasping and manual estimation.
    Ayala N; Binsted G; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2439-2446. PubMed ID: 29923096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.
    Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Action is immune to the effects of Weber's law throughout the entire grasping trajectory.
    Ganel T; Freud E; Meiran N
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical factors may explain why grasping violates Weber's law.
    Utz KS; Hesse C; Aschenneller N; Schenk T
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):22-30. PubMed ID: 25872174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical constraints do not influence pantomime-grasping adherence to Weber's law: A reply to Utz et al. (2015).
    Manzone J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Whitwell RL; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():31-35. PubMed ID: 27876512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
    Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law.
    Heath M; Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():332. PubMed ID: 23267323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND.
    Bhatia K; Löwenkamp C; Franz VH
    J Vis; 2022 Nov; 22(12):13. PubMed ID: 36374493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object complexity modulates the association between action and perception in childhood.
    Freud E; Culham JC; Namdar G; Behrmann M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Mar; 179():56-72. PubMed ID: 30476695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.
    Ozana A; Berman S; Ganel T
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():573352. PubMed ID: 33329216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):977-988. PubMed ID: 28871420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision in grasping: Consistent with Weber's law, but constrained by "safety margins".
    Uccelli S; Pisu V; Bruno N
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Dec; 163():108088. PubMed ID: 34800489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinct visual cues mediate aperture shaping for grasping and pantomime-grasping tasks.
    Holmes SA; Lohmus J; McKinnon S; Mulla A; Heath M
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 23971991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.